GC 2012: Looking Back May 15, 2012
Posted by Dan R. Dick in General Conference, Personal Reflection, The United Methodist Church, Uncategorized.Tags: General Conference, The United Methodist Church
23 comments
Okay, following a surreal April (Korea, a week on the road in-state, two weeks at GC in Tampa) I took a week off to reflect, reconsider, and to hack my way through a rotten chest cold. Now I am back to review what the heck happened at General Conference — at least from my point of view. Anyone who reads my blog knows I wasn’t overly surprised at what happened. I was a little surprised that Plan UMC went through as easily as it did from the floor, and I made a commitment to work with whatever happened, but there was no surprise or shock when judicial council ruled it out of order. The original three weren’t in order — why should a hybrid of the three be any different. I was one voice among hundreds trying to raise questions and concerns before GC, and they were summarily ignored. This could not have gone another way. Then IOC proposal was slapdash and based on spurious outside “help” and Plan B and MFSA were reactive and incomplete (which I said all along, so I am not taking “cheap shots” now). The MInistry Study fared little better, for many of the same reasons. We can’t just make this stuff up as we go along. And when the emphasis shifted from discerning a strong future to southern backroom politics, everything fell apart. The white good ol’ boys learned a new lesson this year: their day is done. We are a new church, and slapping together an old political machine to try to run it isn’t going to fly. The southern voting block is strong enough to STOP just about anything, but it is not strong enough to ram anything bad through.
Winding Down & Wrapping Up May 5, 2012
Posted by Dan R. Dick in General Conference, Personal Reflection, The United Methodist Church.Tags: General Conference, The United Methodist Church
8 comments
Okay, friends, what have we learned? First, General Conference is hard. It is emotionally, physically and spiritually taxing. It demands a Herculean amount of concentration and effort, sifting and sorting and making sense of thousands (literally) of pages of very tiny print of churchy legalese. And it is not perfect. We passed a plan, then it was ruled unconstitutional. Is it the end of the church? No, no matter what the doom-and-gloomers might want you to believe. We are left with the flawed church we have had for years. Now we need to get creative and work together to make it better. We need to stop worrying quite so much about our hierarchy and power and think instead about our potential and authority.
Our theme this year at General Conference is our mission — yet we have not given any measurable time to thinking, dreaming, talking, planning or scheming about what this really means to us. What would it be like if we came to consensus that disciple-making is a worthwhile past time? We could spend two weeks together crafting strategy to transform the world. Wouldn’t that be cool? Instead of lamenting that we have so many small membership churches, what if we optimized our potential and made stellar small membership churches a badge of honor. What if we took time in Christian conference to talk about scriptural authority in a global context? What if our time was about building bridges instead of walls?
Many are disappointed by our aborted quadrennial gathering and the lack of decisions made. But could it be that we failed in our decision-making because we are deciding on too many wrong, less important things? This is a mandate to get our act together. Our planning needs to shift from form to function, process to performance. We cannot let things rest as they are. The time for renewal and redemption is now. Let’s all commit to work together to bring something great out of our chaos.
Back to the Future May 4, 2012
Posted by Dan R. Dick in General Conference, Personal Reflection, The United Methodist Church.Tags: General Conference, The United Methodist Church
6 comments
I have endeared myself once again to the powers that be. When asked about my impression of the Plan UMC, I described it as “a resurrection of the General Council on Ministries with its delusions of grandeur fulfilled,” and some took offense. Well, sorry about that, but what we adopted is not going to position us for growth into the future — it is positioning us to do the kind of ministry and micro-managed regulation we did in the late 20th century. However, if we use this structure wisely, it can actually produce some solid results. The choice of system is critically important, but we haven’t maximized the potential of any of our structures or systems for years. The key is simple: the new General Council on Strategy and Oversight (GCSO) must realize that it is designed to create an unsustainable tension. Strategy is the boat, ready to sail. Oversight is the dock, anchoring the boat in place. In the very early days, one of the two functions must take precedence. If we have the wisdom to give strategy precedence, we should be fine. If our focus is on oversight, we won’t go anywhere. The great challenge is this: we love oversight, but we have to hire outside consultants to do strategy for us. We may just micro-manage our General church out of existence with the very best of intentions.
To Rainbow or Not To Rainbow… May 3, 2012
Posted by Dan R. Dick in Christian witness, General Conference, Personal Reflection, The United Methodist Church.Tags: General Conference, The United Methodist Church, Unity
36 comments
I am as divided as my General Conference on today’s protest by the Lesbian/Gay /Bisexual/Transgender (LGB
T) nonviolent demonstration at GC. Here is proof positive that non-violence can still be disruptive. Whether it was effective is another matter. As for me, I donned a rainbow stole this morning for a while… then I took it off. I am so frustrated that this artificial polarization allows a sympathetic moderate no place to stand (or fall). I have long spoken out against making this “the homosexual issue” because it is a fallacious reduction of our relationship to our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters. A core question being, are they Christian brothers and sisters, or are we, as a denomination actually claiming they cannot be Christian if they are gay/lesbian? And compounding this tragedy? We think we can settle this “issue” by voting on it! Making the reality of men and women with a gay/lesbian predisposition a legislative contention is self-defeating — and it leads to the kinds of protests being lodged at GC today.
Green Light Plan UMC May 3, 2012
Posted by Dan R. Dick in General Conference, Personal Reflection, The United Methodist Church.Tags: General Conference, The United Methodist Church
10 comments
Anyone in any kind of planning process knows that a normal and natural progression is from “what we want” to “what we need” to “what we absolutely can’t live without” to “what we can live with.” We arrived today at the final exit — and what we can live with is not so different from what we already have in many ways. It certainly isn’t streamlined or simplified. It will be most interesting to see how power, authority and influence are shifted. I will go on record as saying I don’t think we will save any money in this structural change. If anything, it will cost more than what we already spend — and it won’t result in savings down the line, either. As a voting body, we moved first to reduce the number of people, then to add more bodies back into the downsized structure so that it really isn’t a whole lot smaller at all. We must be very careful not to spend more to accomplish less.
Prayerlamentary Procedure May 2, 2012
Posted by Dan R. Dick in Church humor, General Conference, Personal Reflection, The United Methodist Church.Tags: Church Leadership, General Conference, humor in the church, The United Methodist Church
12 comments
from the Gospel According to Bob, Chapter 9, vss. 1-31 (this is a spoof, not the real Bible…)
1 “Yea, verily, I say unto you,” said Jesus, “God will attend to your petitions, and will give you what you ask in my name.” 2Robert, also called Bob, perked up. “Our petitions?” he asked. 3”Yes. If you petition God, God will grant you the desires of your heart,” Jesus replied.
4After a moment, Robert prayed aloud, saying,
5”Hear my petition, O Lord, which I ask in your Son Jesus’ name,
6Whereas, the Pharisees are acting like know-it-alls and won’t listen to us, and,
Whereas, the scribes won’t give us the time of day, and,
Whereas, the Sadducees are really stuck up and condescending,
7Therefore be it resolved that we would humbly request that you soundly smite them all, and…”
8”Hold it!” exclaimed Jesus. “That’s not what I meant at all.”
9Robert hesitated. “So you wish to speak against the petition?” he asked.
10”Yes I want to speak against the petition! This is supposed to be a prayer, not an order of business!” Jesus explained.
11”But you said we should petition God,” replied Robert. “I am simply doing what you said.”
12”I didn’t mean like this,” responded Jesus. “You don’t petition God to smite people!”
13Bob reflected for a moment. “That’s two consecutive speeches against. I’m afraid you’re out of order – Robert’s rules.” Jesus was silent, staring at Bob.
14John rose to his feet. “Bob, I would like to make an amendment to the petition. I would like to add, ‘and whereas the chief priests are mean to us and try to kill us,’ after the third ‘whereas’ and immediately preceding the ‘therefore be it resolved.’” James piped up, “Second!”
15Exasperated, Jesus spoke once more. “This is unacceptable. You can’t pray to God to smite your enemies; you are to love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.”
16”So, would you like to make that a substitute motion?” asked Bob.
17”Yes, yes, that’s exactly what I would like to do. I want to substitute love for smiting… and grace for judgment, and forgiveness for condemnation, and mercy for violence. I would like very much to substitute all those things!” Jesus shouted.
18”I’m sorry. You can’t move a substitute after making a speech against. And anyway, we already have an amendment before us…” Robert explained.
19Jesus rolled his eyes heavenward and sat down, shaking his head, muttering to himself and the Holy Spirit.
20”So, the amendment before us is to add the chief priests to the ‘to be smitten” list. We have a second. Any further discussion?”
21”I think we should ask God to smite the Samaritans,” added Peter.
22Robert consulted himself. “I think you would need to move that as an amendment to the amendment. If we get a second, you can speak to it.”
23”Second,” offered Judas. Robert gestured for Peter to speak to his amendment.
24“Well, uhm, you know, I hate the Samaritans. I would love to see them get a good smiting.”
25Jesus leapt to his feet. “Point of order!”
26”Huh?” asked Bob.
27”Never mind,” said Jesus. “This is insane. I tell you, the business of God shall not be reduced to the business of humans. You make the will of God a travesty when you make motions and amendments and take votes. You who were once under the Law are now servants of the grace of God.”
28”That’s all well and good,” said Bob, “but how shall we ever get anything done? How will we know what we are to do unless we vote? How will we know who to love and who to revile without a clear process?”
29”Well, here’s an idea,” offered Jesus, “why don’t you just love everyone? Why don’t you trust the Holy Spirit of God to direct your decisions, and whenever you are in doubt, err on the side of kindness, mercy, justice, and compassion?”
30Bob considered this for a moment. “I think we’re going to need to refer that one to a sub-committee… Okay, back to the amendment on the floor to add Samaritans and chief priests to the smiting list. All in favor?”
31With a sigh, Jesus whispered, “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.”
Safety in Numbness May 2, 2012
Posted by Dan R. Dick in General Conference, Personal Reflection, The United Methodist Church.Tags: Church Leadership, General Conference, The United Methodist Church
35 comments
Okay, here’s an idea. We keep paying lip service to our commitment to young leadership and the need to attract and receive more young people into the church. So, for the remainder of General Conference I propose we take two votes on major issues: first, we take the vote of all delegates 40 years of age and under; second, we take the vote of the remainder of the delegates. Of course, we would use the combined total for our decisions, but we would have a comparison to see where the heart, soul and mind of our young adults are in relation to the older church (that significantly outnumbers them). This would be an outward and visible sign that we are serious about listening to our younger leaders. It would also be a clear indicator of our willingness to change versus our desire to maintain the status quo. Are we brave enough to try such a radical departure from “the way we’ve always done it before?” It would certainly be a leap of faith. Do we trust each other enough to see what kind of church our younger leaders would create? I’m not so sure…
Value-Addled May 1, 2012
Posted by Dan R. Dick in General Conference, Personal Reflection, The United Methodist Church, Uncategorized.Tags: General Conference, The United Methodist Church
11 comments
I have heard the rumor that General Conference costs the UMC $1,500 a minute. Framed in terms of investment, this is problematic. What value are we getting from this investment? So far, we have changed little. The tinkering we have managed to date is nominal at best. No set aside bishop, no episcopal term limits, no great movement to anything new (or elimination of anything old). We just returned from a break, and the dominant comment people made to me was, “why are we even here? We will go home and nothing will have changed!” Personally, I think it is a bit too early to throw in the towel and assume nothing will change, but I believe the journey thus far is simply evidence that we lack confidence in the proposals brought forward. In short, the solutions offered don’t actually address the real problems in significant ways. And people would rather do nothing than invest great effort in doing the wrong things better.
Dollar General (Conference) May 1, 2012
Posted by Dan R. Dick in General Conference, Personal Reflection, The United Methodist Church.Tags: General Conference, The United Methodist Church
42 comments
I love my church, and there are very few things it does that both anger and hurt me. In specific terms, I hate it when my own church hates — when it goes out of its way to judge and revile and hold God’s children in contempt. We affirm their goodness then tell them we don’t want them. This is awful. But in the broad and general sense, nothing angers me more than cheapening our Christian faith, watering it down to make it more palatable and easy to do. I sat through a beautiful worship service at General Conference on Monday night (April 30) then had the whole thing ruined by an infomercial for our “Vital Congregations” emphasis. Each of our conferences committed “goal cards” that redefined “Christian discipleship” as attending church, being in a small group, or giving money to the church. (Some did commit to mission projects/work, but not too many). So, what we have now communicated to the world is that discipleship is not about sacrifice, or supreme commitment, or risk, or even death (forget all that icky cross stuff…), but about going to church when we feel like it. We have taken the Biblical teachings attributed to Jesus, and made them simple and easy and cheap. And ALL of our bishops stepped up to witness to this new, disciple-lite definition.
Specific Conference April 30, 2012
Posted by Dan R. Dick in General Conference, Personal Reflection, The United Methodist Church.Tags: General Conference, The United Methodist Church
14 comments
What would it take to move us from the “general” to the “specific?” We have been told by our bishops that this General Conference is not about preserving the institution — but if not, what is it about? We are here, primarily, to plow through literally hundreds of legislative petitions to change our Book of Discipline and other key non-disciplinary articles of polity and doctrine. We are talking about credentialing, orders, structure, complaint processes, insurance, pensions, who to allow into leadership and who to get out of leadership. We are setting numeric goals for numbers of pastors and number of churches and numbers of dollars. Are we talking about prayer? Are we talking about fasting? Are we talking about a more rigorous and intentional study of scripture? No, we don’t have time to talk about content and context, just structure and polity. We do talk about “discipleship,” but the definition by which we mean it still isn’t clear. We keep being promised celebrations, but many of them are infomercials instead. There is much to celebrate at General Conference, and I do not offer anything but praise for the excellent work we do, but these celebrations of our faithful witness are such a small percentage of our time and energy here.
