A few year’s ago, I attended worship at a hot, new, up-and-coming congregation situated in a strip mall, eschewing anything smacking of “traditional” church (at least in The United Methodist system).  We sang a lot of ‘contemporary’ tunes, saw a ‘post-modern’ dramatic interpretation of scripture (in mime and ‘liturgical’ dance) and heard a very funny ‘message’ that neglected to mention God, Jesus, or the Holy Spirit.  The only prayer offered during the service instructed us to “Leave here and be the change you want to see,” at the very end, before the band broke into a hard-rock anthem guaranteed to blast people out the doors.  I had a chance to talk with the pastor and worship leader over lunch, and I asked the question, “So, what is your theology of worship?”  The pastor scrunched up his brow and said, “What do you mean by that?”  I explained, “what are the underlying beliefs and motivations about God and the worship of God that shape and inform what you offer as leaders?”  The worship leader chimed in, “We don’t really think that way.  Worship is about giving people a memorable experience.”  The pastor added, “Our theology of worship is engage, inspire, entertain, and excite.”

This is just one example that illustrates a widespread condition in The United Methodist Church — a common lack of understanding of why we worship, not on the part of the congregation, but on the part of our worship leadership.  In 2002, almost 4,000 churches took part in a survey as part of the study resulting in the book, Vital Signs.  In response to the question about “theology of worship,” 31% of respondents (27% of pastors) “did not understand the question; 17% (20% of pastors) articulated an answer that indicated a confused understanding of the question, resulting in approximately 50% who gave an answer that left some question as to their rationale for worship.  Among the answers from those 50%:

  • “to make people feel better about themselves and the world”
  • “to teach people the Bible and how to live their lives”
  • “our worship isn’t really about theology”
  • “to reach new people with the gospel of Jesus Christ”
  • “we give people a quality experience that makes them proud to be Christian”
  • “we focus more on faith than theology”
  •  “get people on their feet, make them excited about God, and make them”
  • “worship is a port in the storm — a safe place away from the world”
  • “a time to figure out what God is all about and what He wants”
  • “it’s like the filling station — people come to get refueled to cope with the week to come”
  • “it’s what churches do on Sunday morning”

This is not meant to be cynical (much), or even overly critical.  Below I will share some of the more solid, thoughtful answers that give hope.  The point I am making here is that “the unexamined church is not worth attending.”  If we lack a clear theology of worship, we lack a solid foundation upon which to build a community of worshiping Christians — and worship is where we make outward and visible the deepest values and expressions of our hearts.

One of the questions we asked worship leaders was, “What are the expectations around which you design worship?”  (What are you hoping a person will experience who worships with you? is another way of putting it.)  In the majority of cases, the expectations focused on the delivery and performance of worship leaders rather than the experience of the worshiper.  The desire of worship leaders  is that people will hear a good sermon, will hear good music, will feel welcome, will feel comfortable, and will want to come back (the top five answers).  It isn’t until we get to the eleventh most popular answer that we find, “experience the presence of God/Holy Spirit.”  The fifteenth most popular answer is “have the opportunity to praise God,” and number seventeen is “a chance to rededicate their life to Christ.”  In the vast majority of the United Methodist Churches in the sample, worship is fundamentally about us, and only secondarily about God.

Many church/worship leaders offer thoughtful and provocative answers to the theology question.  Among them are some seeds for thought, seeking fertile soil in which to take root:

Every week, we want worshipers to experience four things — we want them to have an opportunity to say ‘thank you’ to God, we want them to better understand God’s will for the lives of God’s people, and we want to challenge them to make a commitment to God, and we want to give them a chance to make that commitment.

Worship is about God.  We don’t use worship to attract new believers; we create meaningful experiences for those who already believe — to honor and praise God.  We build faith through relationships in non-worship settings, then provide times for those who are growing in their faith to worship in meaningful ways.

Our focus is on the Lord.  We gather to worship the Lord.  It’s not for education and it’s not about missions and programs, and it isn’t social time.  We focus on God.  We can do the other stuff in other settings, but worship time is the Lord’s time.

What makes the sanctuary a ‘holy space?’  We want the people who come into our church to experience the presence of the risen Christ and the power of the living God.  If people don’t experience God, then we’re probably getting in the way.  We try to remove anything and everything that takes anything away from a focus on God.

Everything we do, we do with the hope that it will help people pay attention to God.  Our songs and choir help people sing praises to God.  Our scripture reading is done reflectively and contemplatively, to allow people to think about God.  Our prayer times are open to everyone, and we never hurry them.  Our sermons illuminate the scriptures — they are very interesting and sometimes entertaining, but we never allow the information and delivery to replace the real meaning.  We want people to come here to be with God. 

There are some common elements in the responses of worship leaders who give a lot of serious thought to worship.  Among them are:

  • worship is fundamentally about God, then about our relationship with God, and then about us
  • people need an opportunity to offer thanksgiving, praise, and adoration and that is the main purpose of worship
  • it is important to identify specific things for worshippers to receive,  experience, and act upon (and ways to measure how well these things are happening)
  • worship is not a means to an end (as a tool for evangelism, or missions, or education, or stewardship, or fund raising, or making announcements, etc.), but an end in itself — an integrated experience of the community of faith with and for God
  • worship has a purpose and direction, and doesn’t just happen because “that’s what churches do on Sunday”

I am not advocating a particular theology that all United Methodist congregations should subscribe to.  I am reporting that the congregations experiencing the most vital, vibrant, transformational and meaningful worship (as reported by the worshipers, not the worship leaders) are those where the leaders can articulate a clear, precise, deeply spiritual, and widely shared answer to the question “what are the underlying beliefs and motivations about God and the worship of God that shape and inform what you offer as leaders?” 

The other key learning from our survey of United Methodist churches — one that is rather disturbing to me personally — is that 3-out-of-5 (62%) regular worship participants are perfectly satisfied with a “good show.”  United Methodists especially like “great music,” “entertaining sermons,” “children’s choirs/participation,” “comfortable pews,” “easy parking,” and “beautiful windows,” as important elements of worship, regardless of content, subject matter, or message.  These people — regular participants all — don’t really know whether there is a theology to worship or not.  They have little opinion about the substance of their experience, only an opinion about whether they “liked it” or not.  One of my favorite hobbies on my travels is to briefly interview congregants immediately following a worship service.  I regularly ask people what they liked best about the service they just attended.  (“Music” is far and away the number one answer.  “Seeing friends” is number two.  “Being in church” is number three.  Number four is the “sermon/message.”)  The other question I most frequently ask is, “What did you hear about God, and your relationship to God, during worship this morning?”  One-in-five people give me a clear, thoughtful answer.  About a third offer a simple, “God loves us” type of answer, regardless of whether anything of the sort was said in worship.  Another third will honestly say that they don’t remember.  (Within moments of the end of the service…)  What is most troubling is the growing number of people who think for a moment, look puzzled, then say, “You know?  I don’t remember hearing that much about God in the service.”  Certainly, this is a minority response, but the fact that people say it at all is a challenge to our current status quo.

Let me say again, where church and worship leaders think deeply, clearly and intentionally about the role of worship in the life of the community of faith, it is a much more meaningful and potentially transformative experience than in congregations where it is taken for granted or just performed as a matter of course.  It’s worth thinking about — seriously.

47 responses to “Theology of Worship?”

  1. DA in Kansas Avatar
    DA in Kansas

    I think maybe we’re all missing the point. We’ve started studying Leviticus in Bible study and it just blows our mind about all the rules that they had to remember and follow. After reading your article last night and the blogs that followed, I started thinking about one of the churches that my wife and I pastor. When we took it on it was our only church, my wife worked in the town next door, we had a toddler that went with us everywhere and didn’t have a life of his own yet and we were young and dumb with lots of energy, and we put lots of time into this church and it really showed with doubling of attendance and lots and lots of activities.
    Then my wife took a job at a city further away, the toddler grew enough to start school and start having activities that we started attending and we took on another church. Our attendance at our first church has been suffering. We thought that the congregation seemed tired and worn out but after reading your article, along with the Leviticus Bible study, it’s dawned on me that it’s not the congregation that’s wore out, it’s us. I feel God made all the rules and regs. so that the people would spend more time in a relationship with God. God knew that if the people didn’t spend time with God, they would spend time doing something else, probably not very Godly things.
    The point I feel maybe that’s missing is that the up and coming church that you visited was doing things either knowingly or not that were getting people involved in spending time in church and by that spending more time with God.
    When the churches were in their heyday, the people spent most of their time in a church related activity, (tell me how having a baseball team has anything to do with worship), the Sunday schools were full, they did plays, had Sunday after church lunches almost every Sunday and had active mens and womens groups that met several times a month and actually did projects together.
    I not sure whether you enjoyed the contemporary music or the dancing or miming or not, I got the impression that you put it in the class as just entertainment. Whether you did or not isn’t important, but if it got people to come in that didn’t have a previous relationship with God, I call that worship worthy.

  2. Dan Wilson Avatar
    Dan Wilson

    Thank you for this discussion. For well over 30 years I have found that the same issues keep coming up with regard to worship. Too many people including some leaders in our denomination want worship to be a means toward something else -church growth, an increase in giving or something that makes the pastor or the church popular. When we actually ask people to contemplate life in relation to the eternal it is found that this enterprise is “too heavy, too deep, not lively enough or not entertaining enough.” To paraphrase a long tradition of neo-orthodox thinking in response to this, “God is not useful and God is certainly not practical.” People who object to this theological understanding do so on the basis of having placed God under the higher authority of a rational, enlightenment, utilitarian approach. For me this squeezes the miraculous and mysterious right out of The Mysterium Tremendum.

  3. Steve Garnaas-Holmes Avatar
    Steve Garnaas-Holmes

    Here’s my theology of worship in 21 words or less: In Christian worship the people tell the story of God’s grace so as to become a living part of that story.

    In both OT and NT references to actual worship practices, storytelling seems to be consistent. In the OT I think of the Passover, many Psalms, even the Ten Commandments (at least the Sabbath one). Even the notion of the sacrifice has a certain story-telling quality to it. In the NT, look at the apostle’s preaching (like Peter on Pentecost), the Eucharist, the “apostles’ teaching and fellowship” (surely the eyewitnesses had some good ones to tell!), the form of a Gospel, and of course Jesus’ teaching in parables.

    God’s grace isn’t just an inert thing, it’s an event, a process– a story. It’s a story slavery and exodus, about exile and return, about death and resurrection. And when we tell that story we not only remember and praise God, we also become part of the story. We are, in the words of the baptismal rite, “incorporated into God’s mighty acts of salvation.”

    This view of worship sems to address some of the puzzles we’ve dicussed here. Is worship “about” God or us? Worship is WITH God, not just ABOUT God. What experience do we expect to give worshipers? We want them to be transformed. What is the place of praise? Our praise does not spring unbegotten from our lips but flows from God’s grace. is worship a means or an end? It is both: it is a means to a way of living that is continually worshipful as an end in itself. Because God’s grace is an ongoing story, and God is still creating and redeeming, worship is a means to the end of continuing the story that does not end. (Whooo. That last one was fun!)

    So what do you think? What’s your theology of worship in one sentence? Is this one robust enough to work?

  4. Taylor Burton-Edwards Avatar

    For a relatively brief and excellent scholarly approach to Wesley’s criteria for and theology of worship– written by a Nazarene– see Todd Stepp’s paper, here…

    Click to access WTS_Paper_Stepp.pdf

    Peace in Christ…

  5. Taylor Burton-Edwards Avatar

    Jonhyz,

    I guess I’m not sure which “necessity” you are referring to. There have been a number of attempted “reconstructions” of worship that refer to something like a “season of praise” or a “session of praise” or some such thing. Some of that has been the result of cross-pollination from Pentecostal practices and claims made by some in that movement that they can draw straight lines between “Hebrew worship” (about which, really, we know very, very little) and current Christian “imperatives” for worship. Some of it comes from applying the acronym “ACTS– Adoration, Confession, Thanksgiving, Supplication”– allegedly drawn from the Lord’s Prayer, as “the intended biblical model” for Christian worship. Neither, from a scholarly perspective, can really be said to have a valid claim to accuracy.

    The Basic Pattern (sometimes called the “ecumenical Ordo”) does seem to have some warrant as a general way in which one can say that Christians, over time and from the earliest recoverable full texts– from the second and third centuries– have understood and ordered their worship. That basic pattern involves entrance (which would include acts of entering God’s presence, including praise, but other actions as well), proclamation of the word and response (reading, teaching/preaching, prayer), thanksgiving and communion (actually, this would have been primarily communion itself everywhere until the Reformation), and sending forth. Praise in this model is not a discreet segment, but rather something that happens in a variety of ways throughout each “movement” of the basic pattern.

    As for Paul’s quote, I think most biblical and liturgical scholars would see that as descriptive rather than normative. That is, Paul was describing what the Corinthian Christians were doing– or actually probably only part of what they were doing– when they gathered for corporate worship on Sunday nights. This is not a prescription of what they must or must not do, much less an attempt by Paul (or even the Holy Spirit!) to establish THE right way for Christians to worship… and we really don’t know (because Paul doesn’t try to tell us) what the “point” of these practices exactly was in Corinth, or if there was thought to be any one specific point for any of them, except as some kind of expression of praise to God. The notion of praying or singing the psalms as edification (i.e., for the sake of learning something) appears to have been introduced not in early Christianity, but more by the Swiss branches of the Reformation (Calvin, Zwingli, et al). Instead, the concept of edification in worship as raised by Paul in I Corinthians (especially re: the use of tongues and his insistence on interpretation) appears to be about making sure that what we do together can be experienced as intelligible by everyone… rather than glorifying or seeming to focus too much on the “outlier” experiences of a few.

    Hope this helps!

    Peace in Christ…

  6. jonhyz Avatar
    jonhyz

    @Taylor,

    thanks for sharing. i was wondering, does the current necessity for a “praise” segment in our worship services stem out of OT worship rituals? because the NT (acts 2:42) model for christian meetings does not include “praise”.

    the basis for songs would be the “psalms, hymns and spiritual songs” in col 3:16, which seems to suggest songs for the purpose of thanksgiving and teaching. which could be interpreted as “praise”. don’t think paul gives guidelines for that though?

    why “worship” in our services then?

  7. […] Usually I share links via my Twitter feed. However, I came across this blog post by an author, Dan R. Rick, which lamented the fact that Methodist Pastors in the U.S. don’t have […]

Leave a reply to onnster Cancel reply