Among my greatest disappointments, not being able to follow-through on the UM Worship Patterns project is near the top.  I have not engaged in a more interesting — and potentially helpful — project in all my time in research.  This article is a companion to Theology of Worship? and Preacher Feature and wraps up the trilogy of summaries from this brief study.

um church serviceThe central question at the heart of this work is: “What do people expect to happen in worship?”  We looked at the question from both the worship leader’s perspective as well as the person in the pew.  It touches on other significant question’s such as , “Why do we offer worship?” “Why do people come to worship?” and “What effect does worship have on people’s lives and faith development?”  Over 5,500 people participated in this project from 2000-2008 — 5,419 laity and 227 clergy from all five US jurisdictions, and representing accurate demographics across race, age, and gender.  (Note: efforts were made to reflect the social demographics of the United States, not the demographics of The United Methodist Church.  This means ours sample is younger, less female, and much more racially diverse than the average United Methodist congregation, but more accurately resembles “the real world.”)

Why People Come to Worship?

For the vast majority of United Methodists, worship is both a personal and private affair.  Though some come to church to see friends, during the worship hour 88% of worshippers are seeking something for themselves.  What they seek falls into three broad categories:

  1. comfort and encouragement
  2. guidance (and sometimes, challenge)
  3. knowledge (about God and about God’s will)

In all these cases, worship is about receiving more than giving.  Different respondents explain how worship is like “a port in the storm,” “a filling station,” “a time for rest and recovery,” “a place to better understand God,” “a safe space (sanctuary) in a crazy world,” and “time to shut out the world.”  Virtually no one in the sample, pastors included, frame their experience of worship as a “giving” experience rather than a “receiving experience.”  This tends to be both a Western and a modern conceit of worshippers.  Interestingly, there is very little difference between ages, genders, and races in this “giving/receiving” dynamic of worship.

Focus of Worship

Five very distinct foci emerge when you ask questions about the object and subject of the worship experience.  They can be described as:

  1. for us, but about God — we focus on God in worship, but the real beneficiaries are the worshippers.  We use God talk, but it really is all about us, and if worship doesn’t serve our needs and fill our hungers, we won’t bother with it or we’ll look elsewhere until we find it. (48%)
  2. for God, but about us — we focus on the human condition, the world, contemporary issues, our failings, hopes, and dreams all seeking to become God’s people and to better understand God’s will (16%)
  3. for us, about us — we focus on being good people in a complex and demanding world, using a heavy amount of self-help language, but not using a lot of “God/Jesus/Spirit” language.  Generally aimed at younger audiences, though younger audiences tend not to find these experiences that appealing. (9%)
  4. for God, about God — we focus on God and don’t clutter up the worship experience with a lot of extraneous activity (announcements, mission minutes, funding appeals, videos, performances, etc.)  Tends to be highly interactive (liturgical), simple, and grounded in prayer and scripture. (4%)
  5. worship as routine — focus and purpose is vague.  We offer worship because that is what churches do on Sunday mornings.  The elements of worship are present, but there is little clarity as to why we’re doing what we’re doing.  (23%)

worshipIt is somewhat alarming that almost 1-in-4 United Methodist congregations lack any real clarity about the purpose and objectives of worship.  The centrality of God to worship is only high for only 1-in-5 (20%) of United Methodists.  In post-worship interviews with worshippers, only 17% (1-in-6) can remember what was specifically said about God/Christ/God’s Spirit  in the worship service they just attended (this interview occurs within 10 minutes of the conclusion of worship), even when allowed to refer to their bulletin.  When the subject of the message is about popular culture, a personal story or instruction for the worshipper, the percentage of recall jumps to 57%.

Most important to United Methodists is the comfort of the familiar.  The most meaningful worship is worship that contains and offers familiar scriptures and stories, familiar hymns, familiar patterns and rituals, and easily recognizable references from popular culture.  When people feel comfortable in worship and the elements are familiar, worshippers remember and retain more from worship.  (Where worship is familiar, 37% can recount the worship experience fairly accurately, compared to 22% where worship was unfamiliar and lacked recognizable elements).

High Expectations of Low Expectations

Almost everyone (96%) in our survey could articulate very specific expectations for the worship experience.  However, a significant majority of responses were for basic, somewhat pedestrian, expectations.  Grouping the responses in seven general categories, the expectations are as follows:

  1. good music, good preaching (34%)
  2. to feel good, feel better (31%)
  3. to spend an hour (or so) doing what good Christians do (14%)
  4. to get guidance about living a “Christian life” (11%)
  5. to learn about God (7%)
  6. to be challenged in the way I live my life (6%)
  7. to give undivided attention to God to give thanks and praise (5%)

(These do not add up to 100%, because many people offered a composite/hybrid answer that didn’t fit just one category.)  More important than the actual numbers is an interesting critical divide: 75+% of United Methodist worshippers have little or no expectation of being changed by the worship experience.  Only a small minority are looking for guidance to change or a fundamental focus on God and God’s will.

We followed up on the issue of personal change with almost 100 phone interviews.  What we heard confirmed the initial finding: 87% of our interviewees reported some form of “the idea of personal change in my life because of worship,” is completely foreign to them.  However, 82% reported that a significant change in their life (generally negative) would certainly motivate them to attend worship.  This is further evidence that most people see worship as being for and about them (or for them, about God).

Teaching Worship

United Methodist church leaders do not teach people how to worship, they merely assume everyone can, will, and will understand what is happening and why.  Outside of confirmation classes and a few Sunday school groups, only 17 congregations (1.7%) actively teach worship practices — and this is on a rare, occasional basis — often once every ten years or so.  Our interviews indicate that most regular worshippers in our churches (4-out-of-5)  do not know what a doxology or benediction are (by definition, that is — they know they have them, but they don’t know why), cannot define a creed, um worshipdo not know the meaning of “liturgy,” do not understand the differences between types of prayer (confession, intercession, petition, adoration, benediction, etc.), have no clear theological understanding of “offering,” nor do they know what the words “psalter” or “epistle” mean. 

Worship in An Entitlement Culture

Worship is a “me” experience in United Methodism rather than a “we” experience.  91% report that, while it is nice to be part of a congregation (especially when it comes to music), they can worship every bit as well by themselves as they can in a group.  The church is a convenience rather than a necessity.  In an entitlement culture, people believe they have a right to things with little or no responsibility to provide them for others.  This is very true in the church.  Most worshippers in The UMC believe that attendance and financial support are optional and should be left to the discretion of the individual, but they expect that the church will provide for whatever needs they might have without condition.  People want to know that the church is offering worship services regardless of their intention to attend.  We asked regular worshippers if they had any responsibility to the other worshippers in the congregation.  74% needed us to explain what we meant, and overall 85% said ‘no,’ 9% said ‘yes,’ and 6% ‘don’t know.’  The idea of worship as a fundamentally communal act is of low importance to most Methodists — they don’t much care whether other people are in worship or not.

Where’s God in Worship?

We asked a very pointed question — one with which we ended our study — because it may be the most important and the most perplexing: “Do you expect to have an experience of the living God, the risen Christ, or the power of the Holy Spirit when you worship?”  We got four basic responses:

  1. No (72%)
  2. Have never thought about it/don’t understand what we mean (53%)
  3. Would like to (13%)
  4. Yes (11%)

(Once again, there were some multiple answers: “no, but I would like to; yes I do, but I would like to more often; I’ve never thought about it before, but no I don’t…”)  Additionally, out of 227 pastors/preachers in the survey, only 8 (!) claimed that they “expect people to experience God/Christ/Spirit” in worship.  Worship in UM churches is “about” God, and often “for” God, but seldom “with” God.  44 answered that they “hoped” people would experience the divine, but a hope and an expectation are two very different things.

This brief, truncated study, was incredibly illuminating and raised a host of questions.  We offer some of the questions we have wrestled with as conversation starters for worship leaders near and far:

  1. What is the purpose of our worship?
  2. What do we want people to experience when they worship here?
  3. What is the focus of our worship?
  4. Who is our worship about?  Who is it for?
  5. What is the role of God, Jesus, the Spirit in our worship experiences?
  6. What do we “expect” worshippers in our church will experience when they worship here?
  7. How well do we understand the motivations of our worshippers to worship?
  8. How well do we “teach” worship?
  9. What is the significance of worship in the life of a Christian disciple?
  10. How do we help people recover a communal sense of worship as the work of the people of God rather than a collection of individuals?

If you have other questions, please share them.  Almost everyone agrees that worship is crucial to the life of our congregations, but these brief research reports indicate that we have enormous room for improvement.

42 responses to “Great (and Not So Great) Expectations in Worship”

  1. Daniel Benedict Avatar

    Dan,

    Thanks for some excellent and revealing work. What strikes me most is the shocking lack of teaching and reflection going on in our churches with regard to worship: 1.7 percent doing any teaching, even in a decade!

    This confirms the anecdotal work that Dr. Gayle C. Felton did for GBOD in deciding to recommend to General Conference a study of Holy Communion. Pastors are not teaching our liturgy. Laity do not know the meaning of our sacramental practice and feel that it is neglected and poorly done. Now that the study and the official paper on Holy Communion (“This Holy Mystery” and the paper on baptism “By Water and the Spirit”) is published and online (for free), are any churches engaging it? Sounds like not many are.

    The neglect you document is appalling and points to a great need for worship formation across the church.

  2. Rick Avatar
    Rick

    I would like to make a comment…I was really moved by this message and realize that I have a LOT to learn about what it is to be a United Methodist…and a Christian for that matter.

    At least in my case, there are several factors at work:
    1) My upbringing. I was one of those ChristmEaster types who would go the odd Sunday during the year…usually for a month or so after each holiday when Mom realized that we should be going to church. My Sunday School experience was somewhat haphazard. Not because of the teachers but instead because I was missing as often as I was present. I remember many of the stories and such but don’t feel I have a true understanding of what it means to be a Christian.
    2) Comfort level. It wasn’t until recently that I felt comfortable with going to church…actually, I blame my wife. Because of her, I started to go (gotta keep her happy and all that)…then I went to a “Life in the Spirit” seminar with a friend of hers (Roman Catholic, as is my wife). It was there that I think I had my first true moving experience and things really started to turn around for me.
    3) My uncle. Unfortunately, he was a true “Bible Thumper” type. He was constantly pushing the “gotta get Religion into ya”, yet my experience was that he would not follow the Christian path of loving thy neighbor and all of that. He was very much into what he could get out of others…yet professed to love Christ. Hyprocrite, I think is the correct term in this case. I felt that if that was what Christianity was all about, you could keep it.

    So, thank you for keeping up with me…but I have to say that IN SPITE of my uncle and other factors, I am slowly coming around…and I have to say that if changes were made too radically (too quickly) for me, I feel that I would be cast adrift again. I would welcome more education on how to pray, how to worship and more on what it means to be a Christian…but just because people are in it for “what is in it for me”, don’t think it is because they are being selfish…they may be seekers, as I am.

    1. doroteos2 Avatar
      doroteos2

      There is nothing wrong with people seeking to get something personal out of worship — in fact, most do. The research presented indicates a snapshot of what is, not necessarily what ought to be. Indications are that people have a narrow and often skewed understanding of worship. It is the congregation’s responsibility to provide a balanced and full worship experience for worshippers; the burden to demand more from worship doesn’t lie with the worshipper — especially when they are relatively new to the church. The point of this post isn’t “either/or” — focused on either God or us, but the best worship is “both/and” — worship of God that inspires, encourages, educates, and challenges the worshipper. Balance is the key — not making worship so much about us that we lose sight of God.

  3. Taylor Avatar

    Fantastic work, Dan, and most revealing.

    One of the things the “high church” models (historical/classical Christian worship, East and West) preserve is the underlying dramatic structure of sacrifice. Not killing other people or ourselves for the sake of some “cause”– but offering ourselves and our gifts to God, allowing God to bless them, and then receiving and sharing them among ourselves with grateful hearts, enabling us to be sent by God to be among others the goodness and grace we have received from God.

    The value of this underlying dramatic structure was that it held our identity as a ritual community that understood itself as being there primarily for God, but also with God, and that God was there with and for us, too.

    When that underlying dramatic structure was deconstructed, beginning with a variety of Protestant experiments across Europe and England in the 16th century, that dynamic of worship as deeply interactive with God for God’s sake and for ours began to break down as well. Some experiments moved into mere God-centeredness, proposing worship as merely our duty to an All-Sovereign God who might zap us if we don’t (think more extreme versions of Calvinism). Others moved into more antropocentric directions, gatherings happened to enact or achieve our own peace or centeredness (think Quakerism in its more Quietist forms), or that were primarily aimed at either persuading or moving us experientially (think revivalism and “seeker church”) or teaching us doctrine about God (think American evangelicalism). In all three of these cases, the role of congregation became decidedly that of audience/consumer and to some degree judge of a performance offered by others for our benefit.

    The basic pattern of worship United Methodists have recovered (Entrance, Proclamation/Response, Thankgiving/Communion, Sending) reflects the ancient and pre-Protestant Christian sacrificial norm. But, as we see all around us, and as your study reveals, that same pattern can be used to underwrite whatever other narrative (it’s all about God, or, more likely, it’s all about me) those who design and lead it place upon it.

    Here’s to hoping that some of what we’ve been trying to teach as a church in our seminaries, our official ritual itself, the guides to our ritual, and our teaching documents about sacraments, will begin to pierce through what are clearly still the more dominant paradigms, still spinoffs from 16th century experiments, through which both our congregations and our clergy still view their role in worship.

    1. doroteos2 Avatar
      doroteos2

      Great background, Taylor. I am with you… we have some very valuable traditions that are not only worth recovering, but can help us clarify our identity and purpose.

  4. PamBG Avatar

    We really worked to probe people’s motivtions at a more-than-superficial level.

    Thank you. I stand down. 🙂

    1. doroteos2 Avatar
      doroteos2

      Hey, we’re all friends here. It is good to be able to explain the process in more detail. I have rarely done research that was more stimulating and interesting than the work we did on worship patterns, practices, and attitudes in The UMC.

  5. larry cox Avatar
    larry cox

    Cannot help but wonder what set of words that you would use to accurately describe what the UMC is today. Over 40 years ago when I was just a few years from being in Rev. Hollon’s target group for the new ad campaign, my friends told me that the Methodist church in my community was for the rich people in our community. Not sure that was really that accurate. What is it now?

    1. doroteos2 Avatar
      doroteos2

      The words that come most quickly to mind are “unfocused, unaligned, fragmented, and well-meaning.” I’m sure more will come, but it feels like our denominational system isn’t sure what its priorities are, but it has a deep commitment to its own preservation. At the same time, it has incredible potential to maximize the good it already is doing. Maybe “confused” is the best descriptor…

  6. eric pone Avatar

    I forwarded this to my congregation with an addition to your title. (Lord Lord Lord!!)
    You know your post explains why megachurch’s do so well. They keep the message simple and personal. The order of worship is typically as follows:

    1) Praise and Worship 3 songs

    2) Opening Prayer

    3) Announcements (video with high use of humor emphasis on activities that build relationship with Jesus)

    4) Offering 1 Song

    5) Message focus on personal development or how to

    6) Altar Call

    7) Close

    This is the pattern every service, regardless of who is preaching or the season, every time. They don’t bother with high liturgy because they assume that most folks don’t know it. (I don’t think they know it) But the key thing is people know what they will get.

    Personally, the most impactful sermon I ever heard was at a megachurch with this pattern. Dr. A. R. Barnard preached one Friday night on how christians should deal with problems. I had been dealing with an especially large problem and had been struggling in my prayer life to obtain an answer. Well the sermon literally provided an answered based in scripture that changed my life. Now I don’t remember anything else but that simple sermon.(he used a chalkboard which I thought was the coolest thing.) But that was enough to change my life.

    Maybe we are too complex in our worship pattern. Maybe our worship pattern is no longer relevant to what is needed today. Clearly though our worship isn’t effective. If Worship is so complex that we have to ‘teach’ it have we not put back the hedge around our salvation that Jesus took down in the first place?

  7. PamBG Avatar

    Wow, the post and the responses are throwing up a lot of questions for me. I’m actually quite sympathetic with a lot of what the post is saying. But I’m also wanting to ask the same questions that John M is asking.

    I’m trying to understand a picture of ‘more God-centred worship’ where my worship is potentially made more holy because I either fail to get anything out of it or because I am not able to get anything out of it. Are we actually trying to say here that people attend Sunday services for self-centred reasons rather than to learn how to be servants of the Most High God and of other human beings? I think I take it as read that we will eventually ‘get something out’ of such servanthood.

    Stephen M, as someone who loves liturgy and who often feels very much like a fish out of water in Methodism in that regard, I’m still trying to understand your apparent one-on-one correspondence with formal historic liturgy and ‘genuine worship’? Maybe you could develop that in a post on your blog sometime? I’ve most certainly attended ‘liturgies’ where worship seemed almost entirely absent and I’d not make that kind of tight connection. Or am I misunderstanding you?

    1. doroteos2 Avatar
      doroteos2

      There’s certainly nothing wrong with people seeking to get something from worship — it’s just incomplete. I think the problem comes from the fundamental shift in the 20th century of church being a central part of people’s lives to something they attend on Sunday morning for worship. When people were part of an integrated community, there was time and space to explore the personal questions, concerns, and hungers of faith. When church became an hour for worship, we tried to cram everything into it. The natural shift was off of the “worship of God” to “God’s people in worship.” It is a subtle, but significant, shift. This is not an either/or issue. People get an enormous amount out of God-centered worship. What is troubling is the rise of worship that has less and less to do with God, and more and more with keeping the gathered congregation (audience?) happy and comfortable. What “high church” does that is different is that it maintains a standard of focus on God that is too easily lost. Not that all “high” church is superior by any stretch of the imagination. If any worship fails to connect with the gathered people, it fails unconditionally. Liturgy — literally “the work of the people” — is our best guide: sound worship is the gift/focus/intention of the gathered (collective and shared) community of faith to honor and glorify God. We have other avenues for education, fellowship and performance. We don’t need to clutter and confuse the worship time with things that pull our attention away from God and our relationship with God as the people of God. This is more art than science. The research shows that there is a significant disconnect between our historic and traditional expressions of worship and what people come to receive. Perhaps there are ways to build bridges so that both can be served with integrity.

      1. PamBG Avatar

        A few random thoughts, I hope not too disconnected.

        1) You said: ‘When people were part of an integrated community, there was time and space to explore the personal questions, concerns, and hungers of faith. When church became an hour for worship, we tried to cram everything into it. The natural shift was off of the “worship of God” to “God’s people in worship.” It is a subtle, but significant, shift. This is not an either/or issue.’

        I totally, absolutely, 100% agree with this. And it’s also why I don’t think the church should be dumbing down worship to attract the unchurched. I’d also hope that the church would stop beating itself up for not attracting people who are in ‘consumer mode’ and can’t be bothered. I’d prefer that we ‘just’ remained faithful to the Gospel and kept our worship faithful. Where I’m not convinced, though, is that faithful worship requires a particular form – be that form liturgical or more free-form.

        2) I *am* wondering about the methodology of the poll and the conclusions that we draw from it. Because if you’d asked me, as a minister, why I attend worship I’d probably have said a number of the same things the people polled said. I’d also probably have avoided any choices along the lines of ‘Because I think I must’. But nonetheless, I *have* made a commitment to regular worship beyond leading worship. And I do sometimes attend worship when I don’t want to be there because it’s a commitment. But mostly I go to church and pray ‘because I get something out of it’. Maybe you’d want to call me a ‘consumer church goer and pray-er’ in light of my answers, but I think the reality is a lot more complicated than that.

        3) I agree with your idea about one of the ‘strengths’ of ‘high church’ (now there’s another term that needs picking apart!) worship. But as someone who grew up a strict Lutheran and who has spent a good part of my life attending ‘liturgy’, I’m a afraid I’m a bit more cynical than that. The incident that sticks in my mind is a lunch-time Anglican eucharist when I was working in London. The priest when through the liturgy faithfully. The very loud message I got from that service was ‘I have something extremely important to do after this and I’d rather not be here; let’s get this over with as quickly as possible as another event in my busy day’.

      2. doroteos2 Avatar
        doroteos2

        We really worked to probe people’s motivations at a more-than-superficial level. For instance, here are my verbatim notes from a typical Q&A:

        “When you go to a worship service, what do you expect to experience?”
        “Well, I know there will be great music, and the preacher is exceptionally bright and funny…”
        “But, do you have any expectations about what the experience will mean to you?
        “You mean like, will I be inspired or set on fire to change the world? No, not really. I go to church to feel good about my faith and to be reminded that God loves me.”
        “So, is it fair to say, you expect to be affirmed and cared for?”
        “Yeah, that’s why I go to church…”
        “And do you feel challenged when you go to church?”
        “Oh, I hate being made to feel guilty, if that’s what you mean. I used to go to a church where the pastor was always telling us we owed it to God to clean up the world. That got tiresome. I go to a church now that is focused completely on the love of Jesus.”
        “So, you feel the love of Jesus in your church?”
        “Yes, I do.”
        “Do you ever expect to have a deep, spiritual experience in church… in worship? Do you expect to experience the presence of God or the Holy Spirit?”
        “No, no, I’m not into that. I do sometimes feel really peaceful and happy. I love that.”

        This indicates the level of engagement on each question. I drew inferences from the overall tone about some of the answers, but we probed on both sides of what people do and don’t expect, and came up with fairly clear indications of what people anticipate. Even with the initial survey, we tried not to just let people off with “yes/no” closed responses, and we followed up in dozens of conversations.

Leave a reply to Andrew Bentley Cancel reply