Mercy and Justice for All

People’s United Methodist Church has a year-long theme for 2022 – Mercy and Justice for All. At one level, this is self-explanatory; at another it involves some complex unpacking. It is hard to imagine that any Christian believer would find fault with such a sentiment and theme, yet we see a whole lot of less-than-charitable attitudes toward those most needing mercy and hungering for justice.

Also, we have modern, Western definitions of both mercy and justice that have evolved over time and space, and are weirdly related to original concepts from Hebrew and Christian scriptures. When we hear the word mercy, we tend to think in terms of leniency and compassion offered to people deserving of harsher punishment or treatment. Mercy, as we define it, it about power – only those with power and authority may extend mercy to those under them. We don’t have many examples of the weak and powerless being merciful to those in control. The original Greek concept of mercy (έλεος) contains the aspects of compassion and kindness, but digging deep into its meaning, it literally means “covenant loyalty.” This is not such a stretch when it is unpacked. God sent Jesus as Savior to all people as the ultimate act of covenant loyalty. God pursues us actively to forgive and redeem us. This is an ultimate expression not only of leniency and compassion, but unconditional love and unmerited grace. God’s mercy is as boundless as God’s love.

Justice (δικαιοσύνη) has the same elegant nuance. Beyond what a person deserves, justice is about equity, fairness, and an honest accountability. Justice is NOT fundamentally about punishment, vengeance, judgment, or condemnation. It is not a way to distinguish good from bad, right from wrong, holiness from evil, but a foundation of integrity, transparency, and the well-being of the common good. Justice is a value of seeing all human beings as equally precious in the eyes of God. Unfortunately, we live in a society that has been indoctrinated with images of vigilantly justice steeped in violence and revenge. Batman, Rambo, John Wick, and others like them provide the shadow side of true justice.

Note that both of these concepts are grounded in “we,” rather than “me.” This isn’t about how we treat an individual, what they deserve, or what we feel like doing with them. If we commit to be loyal to God’s covenant, we will be merciful as a core characteristic of our culture. If we commit to honest accountability, we will become a fair, equitable, kind, and compassionate people. We won’t have much to debate on a case by case basis; we will be just and merciful to all or not.

And that brings us to “all.” We struggle mightily with all. There is something hardwired into our wetworks that distrusts “the other.” And once we determine a moral code, no matter how strict or lax, we divide everyone into insiders/outsiders, who is acceptable, who is unacceptable. A liberal trope is “All means all,” and I love the sentiment, but it denies the incredible obstacles and challenges in establishing inclusive and total rapport across differences and divisions. For any group, including some excludes others. This is where we are; this is what we must confront and transform.

For me, we need to stop talking about people as categories, demographics, niches, targets, topics, problems, coalitions, tribes, races, ethnicities, cultures, languages, etc. Yes, certainly, we account for these things, but we don’t build relationships with categories etc.; we relate to real, live people. In each of the divisions I delineated above, I know positive individuals and negative individuals and none of them are representative of everyone connected to them. Unless and until we create personal encounters and engagement, nothing significant will change. Likewise, information, as important as it is, will not take us to new places. The concepts and key learnings contained in research and sociological studies are very valuable, but they are limited. Beyond information, we need formational engagement that opens the door to radical transformation.

If the disciples at People’s have any chance of transforming our world, it is likely to be one person at a time. The frustration with this is that it is slow and provincial; the exciting aspect is that there is an unlimited supply and we will never run out of opportunities to improve and grow.

So our vision is covenant loyalty to include and support all people in all places in all ways at all times. It is a step-by-step process, but it must begin with first steps, no matter how faltering and awkward they might be. We can’t change the whole world, but we are committed to change the part of the world we are in.

Categories: Uncategorized

5 replies

  1. The invitation or command (“Love your neighbor…”?) to change the world one person at a time is challenging. Maybe the only way through the mess we’re in, but maybe the “covenant loyalty” you mention at the end is a helpful key for me. Can the one-person-at-a-time include each of us working in cooperation with other like-hearted folks in, say, a commitment to contact legislators regarding common-good issues? Perhaps the one person i need to change most often is myself.

    i’m wondering if i can be encouraged/challenged/helped to love the person in front of me (i think that idea came from a Jimmy Carter book) while at the same time learning more about loving myself. All as a demonstration of loving God.

    • Dave, this is a variation on the “think global/act local” sense of not being overwhelmed by the immensity of many of our issues, but to focus on what we can actually and concretely do. Working on the current system is well within the “one person at a time scenario.” During my many years serving on the Board of the General Board of Church and Society, I visited Tammy Baldwin and Ron Johnson personally every time I could. Both voiced appreciation. I understand this was purely political, but it was something well within my control, and it allowed me to focus on what I believed important. I always encourage letter writing, advocacy, petition signing — we cannot control the response, but we can always control our actions; our attempts to impact our world in positive ways one/each person at a time.

  2. Thank you – certainly something to mull over. In a way I’ve found it sadly funny how the UMC has been trying to define how we should not be discriminatory but keeping increasing all the groups we should not exclude. Somehow naming all those groups does nothing more than divide us even more. I’ve always bristled at diversity training when it just boils down to show respect – not matter who it is – just show respect.

  3. I appreciate your review of a year with “mercy” and “justice”.

    Does the congregation or yourself have a bibliography on this 2021 focus? If so I, would appreciate a copy and suggest posting it here.

    I presume there will be a 2022 theme. Readers here might appreciate a notice of that and even a monthly up-date and mention of resources being used to investigate the arena of exploration.

    • Sorry, Wes, I was unclear. Mercy and Justice for All is our 2022 theme. We are working through worship, small groups, book studies, and action planning to organize and align around these issues. I will publish our bibliography, and the concrete planning based on these “topical” focus areas. Thanks for the nudge.

Leave a Reply to zuhleika Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s