shapesorterWho hasn’t seen a shape-sorter ball for infants and toddlers?  From the earliest days of our cognitive development, we learn to identify, differentiate, associate, and categorize.  It is so much fun to watch the joy of a child slipping the appropriate shape through the proper slot.  It obviously imprints strongly on the human psyche… because we try to do the same thing with people later in life.  Slipping people into “slots” is a normal and regular activity in this creature we call church.

We slide people into leadership slots — filling rosters of boards, committees, councils, and teams — to make sure we have the human resources to keep our programs and ministries running smooth.  However, in many cases we treat all the different shapes and sizes of Christian disciples as interchangeable — forcing them to fit our slots, rather than bothering to match our need to their shape.  Often, this is unintentional.  We start with our systems and structures in place and we feed people through the system like meat through a meat-grinder — many cuts go in, but what comes out is all ground beef.

This one-size-fits-all mentality extends beyond the local congregation to the annual conference in United Methodism.  A number of seminarians and young clergy in the ordination process talk about “jumping through the hoops,” “toeing the line,” and “only saying what others want to hear,” as ways of explaining how they disguise their individuality so that they can “get in the system.”  Many feel that if they say what they really feel or believe, they may not be ordained.  A young female candidate told me told me just this year, “I look around at other young clergy and I’m trying to look and talk and act just like they do.  It’s the best way to get ordained in this conference.”

Cookie-cutter Christianity transcends ethnic and racial lines as well.  We talk about diversity all the time, but we desire a fundamental level of sameness.  Working with one of our larger annual conferences a few years ago that prides itself on its diversity, I met with key leaders from a dozen different racial and ethnic constituencies.  Without fail they lamented the fact that diversity was embraced in the abstract, but not in the concrete.  “The more Western you are, the better off you will be,” offered one.  “All the focus on diversity undermine any kind of real unity.  It merely points out how different some of us are.  It often highlights how much we do not fit in,” lamented another.  “The best way to be different <in this conference> is to be like everyone else,” explained a third.  As soon as he said this, a room full of over forty minority representatives nodded their heads in agreement.

In every community of faith in The United Methodist Church, there is great pride in being a “friendly” church.  Almost every congregation has people who say, “We want new people.”  The unspoken ending of this statement is “…as long as they’re exactly like we are.”  Most congregations are highly resistant to change.  We are most comfortable with people who “fit,” who allow us to stay just the way we are without feeling uncomfortable, insecure, or like we might lose something.  I talked with a young couple who dropped out of a new members orientation class in a fast growing congregation when they were told that their reverence and respect for Buddhism was “unChristian” and unacceptable.  “Our small group leader actually told us that we would probably be more comfortable going to the Unitarian Universalist church across town,” shared the young woman.  Her husband chimed in, “We actually should have been suspicious when we drove into the parking lot and parked our SUV next to a dozen other SUVs, all of our cars with infant car seats in the back, and ours the only one lacking a fish magnet on the rear door.”

One of my favorite Vandy students from a few years back was a young goth woman named Myron (yeah, I know…) who loved visiting churches to freak people out.  Myron knew the Bible really well — better than most active church members — which made her doubly dangerous.  She told me a story that I absolutely love.  One Sunday she dressed in black fishnet stockings, a lacy black frock, with coal black hair spiked ten inches off her scalp to the left, and elbow-length black evening gloves.  Dark purple eye make-up, black lipstick, piercings of nose, tongue, eyebrows, ears, and cheek, and a black teardrop tattoo completed her Sunday-go-to-meeting ensemble.  She walked into a large United Methodist Church, picked up a bulletin, walked the entire length of the center aisle, climbed the steps to the chancel and seated herself behind the lectern.  Stunned silence swept through the sanctuary.  An usher tentatively made his way forward to ask Myron if he could help her.  She smiled at him and said, “No thank you.  I am a minister of the gospel of Jesus Christ and I am here to share good news.”  He responded, “but, you can’t sit here.”  She asked him why not?  He withdrew, seeking reinforcements.

The pastor swept up the aisle and asked Myron if he could help her.  Brightly, she said, “No.  In fact, I’m here to help you!”  Through clenched teeth, the pastor hissed, “What do you want?”  Without hesitation, Myron answered, “I want to tell your congregation about the love of Jesus Christ.”  In exasperation the pastor threw up his hands and said, “Well, you can’t do that here!”  Ignoring the surface paradox, Myron asked, “Would you let me if I were dressed differently, or wore my hair differently, or had on different make-up?”  The pastor responded, “No, we wouldn’t let anyone speak in our church who didn’t belong.”

Who belongs?  Who fits?  Who is a minister?  Who is worthy to be heard?  Who has the “right” to share the good news?  In our square hole congregations what will we do with all the “people-pegs” shaped like stars, crescent moons, triangles, circles, trapezoids, plus signs (crosses???), as well as the snowflakes, supernovas, cubes, rhombuses, and fractals?  Do we really believe there is a place in the body of Christ for everyone?  Is our commitment to diversity more than just lip service?

Ours is a wild, wacky, and wondrous world, filled with eccentricity, individuality, and complexity — all by God’s own design.  We need to develop a healthy shape ball spirituality — one that makes space for the full diversity of God’s glorious creation.

22 responses to “Shape Ball Spirituality”

  1. Myron M. Avatar
    Myron M.

    Thanks, you little s***. You outed me! You just reduced my shock value by 50%. I didn’t know what happened to you. I always remember fondly the St. Augustine lunches at Chili’s, especially when you wore a suit and we all wore black with chains and all our metal. You looked like our therapist! I am living in Tel Aviv and working on reconciliation with Palestine. It is an amazing time to be here. The sense of history is incredible.

    Anyway, thanks for telling the church that people like me aren’t evil vampires or crazy witches, but good old Christians just like they are. Kisses.

  2. Rho Avatar
    Rho

    Myron’s three theses are well-considered.

    1) We ARE a living in a culture of fear not of faith, and I find it disturbing (especially to the degree I see MYSELF living in it).

    2) I’m not terribly worried about “non-professionals” preaching the gospel (I help to train our district’s lay speakers after all), but I would have some concerns with a “non-confessional” attempting to preach the good news in a congregation for which I am responsible. I think the pulpit is for the “credentialed” for lack of a better term; I wouldn’t let my own mother preach if I weren’t confident about the content of her proclamation.

    3) “Having worship disrupted” is an interesting turn of phrase. I’d love to have our Sunday service disrupted by an outpouring of the Spirit or by an especially prophetic moment or by a spontaneous outburst of praise. On the other hand, call me a curmudgeon, “but all things should be done decently and in order” (1Cor. 14.40, NRSV). Had Myron appeared at a church I serve, I might have shared Paul’s advice with her and let her know that we give an opportunity for testimonies and other words “for the good of the community” at a fixed time during the liturgy and that she would be more than welcome to share with the congregation at that time.

    1. doroteos2 Avatar
      doroteos2

      Thanks for your thoughts. Myron intentionally chose the lectern and not the pulpit, for reasons similar to your own. Where Myron has been welcomed and included in worship, she has done a lovely and deeply respectful reading of scripture without further commentary. She told me that she has been accepted and welcomed about twenty times — never in a United Methodist Church (of open minds, hearts, doors fame — her comment, not mine) — but generally in smaller, poorer congregations. In her own words, “I give the heebie-jeebies to Pharisees and Sadducees.” In the churches that accept her, she reports that “everyone has asked me to come back!” She makes another insightful and provocative observation, “Where worship is about God, I’m seen as less of a threat. Where worship is a performance, I am not welcome at all. I am never rude or adversarial. Where the focus is on God, the response is neither rude or confrontational. Where the focus is on anything else, people — especially pastors — tend to attack. Where the treasure is, there the heart is also.”

  3. Ed Avatar
    Ed

    Dan, you have a habit of hitting me in the right place at the right time. Your last 2 posts have really struck a cord with where I am trying to move my congregation, as well as one or two areas I am struggling with in my own walk of faith. Keep poking me and opening my eyes.

  4. Creed Pogue Avatar
    Creed Pogue

    There is a big difference between someone new coming to a church and asking to share their testimony versus someone (who could just as easily have been a mental patient) walking to the front of the church and saying they want to run the service. That pastor was absolutely right, “We don’t do that here.” I would genuinely wonder about the viability of any church that gave a worship service that unstructured each week.

    Currently, we do a poor job of welcoming anybody so perhaps we should try to start with the ones “who look like us.” Apparently, there are another seven million United Methodists out there who say they are UMs but aren’t members of a UM church. Instead of offering ten thousand doors, maybe we should focus on the low-hanging fruit first.

    1. doroteos2 Avatar
      doroteos2

      Yeah, Creed, you kind of make my point here. No one at the church even tried to find out whether Myron was crazy, troubled, or had something of real value to offer. There was no attempt to connect, just to solve the problem she caused. A little background on Myron — she is a gifted young woman with a 170+ IQ, two Ph.D.s (at age 23), one in philosophy and one in ancient Middle Eastern studies. She was most likely the smartest person in the church she visited. She posits three theses that she tests everywhere she goes. First, church leaders like having worship disrupted no less today than they did when Jesus did it, and people who shake things up will be viewed as crazy, dangerous, or demon possessed. Second, church leaders will not want good news preached by “non-professionals” any more than those who told Jesus, “we don’t do that here.” And, third, we are a culture of fear, not of faith. In a culture of fear we will always assume the worst, feel threatened (even by a 5’1″, 93 pound female), and treat strangers with suspicion. In a culture of faith we seek first to understand, then to be understood, and we extend a hand of welcome, even to those who disrupt our status quo. Myron will not be welcomed in 97% of our United Methodist churches, because very few of our members will look past the superficial external appearances to discover the child of God beneath. Our assumptions will continue to blind us, and Myron will continue to seek acceptance, because lip service simply won’t cut it. Was Myron pushing the limits and testing our openness in a confrontational and “in your face way?” No question. She learned it from the gospels.

  5. Taylor Burton-Edwards Avatar

    Dan,

    It occurs to me that the shape ball is an appropriate metaphor in another way. When babies and young children (and, okay, some adults!) play with it, they’re all about trying to fit the different shapes INTO it. Once they’re in, it doesn’t matter what they look like anymore. They’re just in. And unless someone who knows the trick and has the strength to open the ball happens by, in they’ll stay. The baby or young child doesn’t care about what’s IN at that point– the attention shifts to rolling or throwing the whole ball around with whatever is inside it.

    Older children, however, start trying a different game– getting the pieces to come back out WITHOUT opening it.

    It seems to me that the “trying to shapes get into it” game may be part of the paradigm problem. Congregations, as public institutions, weren’t designed to be hard to get into. Heck, it wasn’t even really any sort of heroic thing to get “into” one at all. You could come in. You could go out. There “boundaries” for the congregation were pretty porous– and intentionally so.

    One still sees this principle operating– nearly every Sunday and holy day in fact– in Orthodox worship (particularly in countries outside the US). People literally come in and out at different points in the liturgy, and that’s not seen as a problem. The congregation doesn’t pride itself on how many folks its gets to show up at worship.

    Here’s where our “hybrid” ecclesiology– trying in essence to be both “sectarian” (Methodist society) AND “Church” (open to all, we think) at the same time in the very same structure– gets us into a conundrum. To the degree the congregation functions in a sectarian way, it really is trying to get more people IN. Once they’re in, it’s really not all that desirable to get them back out, because what we want to show to the world is how good we are at getting all those shapes IN, even though the shape we show to the world is pretty uniform (the octagonal ball thingy, but a bit noisier now since it has more shapes IN it).

    Part of the trouble might be that we don’t have enough people who come by to twist the ball to get those shapes back out again. Another part of the trouble might be that we’re like the babies or young children who’ve been taught that having the shapes OUT is not the optimal condition– only having them IN does that.

    The older children may be on to something. They see BOTH conditions– shapes in and shapes back out– as potentially optimal. They also enjoy putting the shapes in the ball, but they’re really more interested in finding any way they can to get them back out SHORT of “cheating” (like their parents do) by “breaking open the ball” so the shapes come spilling out all at once. What they’re less interested in (though they don’t seem to despise it) is playing with the whole ball as if “noisy and full inside, uniform outside” were the main point or value of the whole shape-ball game.

    So “inside” has some value. Outside has some value. Moving from outside inside has some value. The ball itself as an “institution” that helps to create the inside/outside distinctions has some value. But the greatest fun (for them) seems to come from getting what’s inside back out again in creative ways.

    There must be some lessons in that…

    Peace in Christ,

    Taylor Burton-Edwards

    1. doroteos2 Avatar
      doroteos2

      Thanks for extending and playing with the metaphor. Your thoughtful insights add an important and helpful dimension. Getting all the shapes in the ball isn’t likely to transform anything but the ball.

  6. David B. Springstead, Sr. Avatar

    LOVE the Myron story… wish she’d shown up at the service I lead, I’d have embraced her with open arms and said go for it… not too sure the traditional services would have done the same though.

    Keep on keepin’ on… there’s a bunch of us out here who’re trying to wake up the rest about how we do things and are viewed by “outsiders.”

    Maranatha.

  7. Kelvin Heitmann Avatar

    The Myron story blows me away because I don’t know what I would say as pastor. Reminds me of the local story of the cattleman who went to church and decided he liked the seat up front facing the congregation better than the other pews. His audacity is remembered after years have past, but I don’t believe anyone asked him to take a different seat.

Leave a reply to David B. Springstead, Sr. Cancel reply