Oh, man, time to go fishin’ cause I opened up a can of worms!  For ten straight days my Inbox has been full of emails concerning race relations in The United Methodist Church.  The emails are troubling on two separate levels — one, that people don’t feel safe airing their views publically on the blog (“please don’t post these comments publically…), and two, the stories reflect a serious problem in the way we treat those who are different.  I have received 126 emails — 3 saying that there is no racism in the church today, 21 saying that racism goes both ways and that whites are the current victims of racism, 18 saying it isn’t really racism if it is justified (i.e., if minorities are indeed inferior then we’re not being unfair, just telling the truth…), and a whopping 84 telling heartbreaking and painful stories of racism encountered at all levels of our church systems.  I’ve heard from three bishops, seven district superintendents, one agency general secretary and a whole boatload of pastors who say, unequivocally, racism is alive and all too well in The United Methodist Church.

The problem with such overwhelming response (at least, overwhelming for this small, humble blog…) is that it highlights all the symptoms of the problems, without addressing the root causes.  The bottom-line root cause is simple: we are allowing racism in the church.  And I find it troubling that 2/3 of the stories indicate that racism is a real problem, while 1/3 dismiss it as irrelevant.  We have yet to declare once and for all time that racism is evil and violent and unChristian and unacceptable.  I’m not talking about racism grounded in ignorance or negligence.  I am talking about outright prejudice and bigotry grounded in the hate of people based on heritage or skin color.  I am talking about overt, unapologetic racism.  Now, it may remain hidden and secret for a long, long time, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t there.  If you want to discover whether there is “underground” racism in your midst, accept a cross-cultural appointment.  Regardless of your feelings about cross-cultural appointments, regardless of how “good” or “qualified” the pastor is (both smokescreen issues), if there is racism in the congregation, it will be revealed.

In this case, unChristian is to Christian, as undead is to the living.  We have our emotional and spiritual equivalents in the church to the great monsters of gothic horror fiction — vampires who drain and dissipate positive energy and life, zombies who infect and consume and turn others through their poison, and werewolves who attack and savage and tear apart.  We are talking about creatures who are bent on doing violence, and they don’t care who gets hurt.  These are not merely misunderstood “sinners,” these are the people who are actively doing evil to their brothers and sisters.  Am I overstating?  I don’t know.  This past week I have heard of:

  • death threat phone calls in the middle of the night
  • vandalism of homes and vehicles, with hate messages scrawled in a disgusting variety of substances
  • actual shots fired from weapons at homes
  • children being followed from school or called at home while alone
  • hateful rumors being spread
  • physical assaults
  • name-calling and racial slurs in church
  • destruction of property
  • dead animals left of doorsteps
  • people dressing up in sheets and hoods and running across pastor’s lawns

Now, you may want to defend that these things happen everywhere and they aren’t necessarily racially motivated.  Great.  Sorry, but there is no justification for these types of behaviors in churches, and I believe there is a much higher incidence in race-related situations.  No, this isn’t just about the sin of racism, but about the evil of racism.  This isn’t just “bad” behavior, this is “monstrous” behavior.  Sin is about weakness and wrong-headedness; evil is unrepentant, intentional and self-righteous.  When people repent their racism, there is hope — sin can be forgiven and grace may abound.  But let’s be brutally honest, some folks love their racism and cloak it in a twisted form of Christianity, never acknowledging that the two orientations are mutually exclusive.  One cannot be Christian and racist at the same time.  One precludes the other.  To pretend otherwise is to… well, pretend otherwise.  We will always have to battle bias, prejudice, bigotry and ignorance, but racism is intolerable.  It is a form of evil, and as such we are complicit with it in any system where we do not work to eradicate it.

It is a source of shame that we have named racism (and sexism) as the evil that it truly is (see our Social Principles) yet allow it to continue unchallenged in so many places in our church and society.  It is a virulent infection, a toxic poison, and a debilitating cancer.  It turns people into monsters, and it only takes a few infected hearts to corrupt an otherwise healthy system.  It undermines the integrity of the body, and it accepts disease as normal while rejecting health and vitality.  It becomes part of our witness to the world, thereby destroying our credibility with a hurting, multicultural world.  It proclaims to all the world that we believe intolerance, injustice, exclusivity, and bigotry are simply part of who we are.  Until we take a stand against such behaviors and make racism absolutely unacceptable in The United Methodist Church, our witness is tainted and unChristian.

So, what does this mean?  Do we tell racists they can’t be part of the church?  Yes.  When people join The United Methodist Church, they make a promise before God and the company of believers to reject evil.  We still need to be in ministry to all of God’s people, including racists, but we do not have to allow those who practice hate, violence, and destruction to infect the body.  Racism is a clear violation of our membership vows, our Social Principles, our Theological Task, and our mission and vision.  There is no place for racism in the body of Christ.  But this is just my opinion.  I have been told by many that I am wrong and that you cannot hold people accountable to their vows.  But I question whether people with such hate ever become “members,” no matter what words they say or promises they make.  I cannot quite believe that we would stand by and let one member do physical violence to another, especially repeatedly.  Certainly, we would continue to care for such a person, but there would be some limits.  This isn’t about “kicking people out” of the church, but being clear what “being in” the church is all about.

One email really took me to task for being a “pansy” when it comes to the question of race, and wondered why I “buy into” the lie.  I have in my files a picture that was taken at a church I served.  The picture is dated 1915.  It shows the pastor of the church in his robes standing with two men in three-piece suits near the front of the church building.  They are laughing together and appear to be celebrating.  Behind them, hanging by the neck from a tree branch, hands tied behind his back with barbed-wire, is a young, black man.  Surely we have come a long way since 1915…  A few years ago I showed this picture to a well-educated pastor in Nashville, Tennessee.  I will never forget his response.  “Hmmm,” he said, “I wonder what he did to deserve that?”

This story isn’t any worse than the dozens I have heard this past week.  I know there will be many in our church who think I am just rattling on about something that isn’t very important.  But I have lost sleep this week thinking about the future of our church and the future of our world.  I think about how we pride ourselves on our open hearts and minds and doors, but I wonder just how open we really are?  One of the emails I got this morning chastised me for “focusing on a few isolated instances and making a big deal out of nothing.”  Maybe this is true, but I guess I feel like even a few isolated instances are too many for a church the professes the love of God and the grace of Jesus Christ through the Holy Spirit.

47 responses to “A House Divided”

  1. Rex Nelson Avatar
    Rex Nelson

    When the people built a tower to heaven and thought themselves to be almost God, their hubris was punished. The lesson was not to avoid unity, but to start over and achieve it through humility. Racism is, once again, hubris – judging for God, dividing creation. Our world is growing closer – more of us are immediate neighbors than ever before. The Wound of Babel is healing, and the process is painful. We in the United States might be a clear example of racism, but let’s not forget that the problem is worldwide. Let’s not forget the acts of genocide. Let’s not forget the slavery in Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. Let’s not forget the oppression and disharmony in Europe and South America. We are a global church, a global community, in which the breadth of the problem and strength of the solution is manifest. Let’s remember the sacrifice of Jesus, the Grace of God, and the Gift of the Holy Spirit, as the means for us to forgive, heal, and grow.

    I applaud the courage of the AME, AMEZ, and CME in sustaining their communities and building on their own traditions. They have found peace in plurality. I am humbled to the depths of my soul at the example of the Black churches of the UMC, having remained steadfast and faithful in spite of our forcing them to the back of the bus, the Central Conference. It is past time for us to reach across barriers, join hands, pray together, and share the table. Not just the communion table we have set apart from our lives, but the dinner table that Jesus shared with all. Neighboring white, suburban and rural UMC churches resist this even with each other with amazing energy.

    Our ignorance and insensitivity stands witness on our front lawns – the burning cross. Some of us see it as a symbol of the Holy Spirit in two traditions, Methodist and Evangelical, joining around our symbol of Jesus’ sacrifice and our salvation. Others see it and are reminded of the hate and violence perpetrated in the name of the God they know to be loving and forgiving, are reminded of the terror and complete loss of freedom, enslavement, they experience. I use the present tense because the symbol and its meaning is still used for that effect. Knowing that it wounds and crushes part of our family, people we love, how can we insist on using it? Why?

    Your servant in Christ,
    Rex+

  2. Creed Pogue Avatar
    Creed Pogue

    I’m just saying that people should stop saying that the UMC is a racist institution. The objective evidence doesn’t back it up. Additionally, if you want to make the UMC more multi-racial, then claiming that the UMC is racist isn’t going to bring more people in the doors.

    Dan has used anonymous anecdotes with little detail to make his case. My point about GCRR is that I would hope that if there were more egregious situations that they would have gotten more attention since they spent a lot of effort on situations that didn’t deserve it. The two situations I mention with GCRR are public and well-known even if someone didn’t want to admit to them.

    I find it very difficult to accept the idea that a BISHOP (with life tenure) wouldn’t come forward. Of course, I have a difficult time picturing somebody acting toward a bishop with that degree of disrespect since even those of us in the laity make an effort not to be confrontational. Even Mark Tooley doesn’t take off after Bishop Carcano or someone else that he strongly disagrees with.

    Unfortunately, there are plenty of ignorant people out there, but that ignorance, unfortunately, doesn’t discriminate on the basis of race or gender–they’re just ignorant.

  3. doroteos2 Avatar
    doroteos2

    Okay, I am doing something I have rarely done before — I have trashed two comments/replies to comments due to what I believe are “nasty” and uncalled for responses. No name calling. No personal attacks. If you want to disagree with an opinion expressed here, you have an open forum. If you resort to name calling or insults, I’m not going to allow the comment. People come at issues of faith in a wide variety of ways, and there is never going to be a time when we all agree. But people who get aggressive and abusive are missing the whole point of this post. It is precisely the ugly, hateful, and violent behaviors of United Methodists I want to challenge. Please be kind to each other, even when you disagree.

  4. Creed Pogue Avatar
    Creed Pogue

    I don’t believe that the racism in our churches nor our various mis-directed responses to it have directly caused our membership decline.

    I do believe that we need to be realistic and practical about our real appeal to racial/ethnic persons. The AME and AMEZ exist because of the overt racism of our predecessors. If they admitted that overt racism is no longer present, then what is their reason for being? Just a thought. More importantly, I sincerely doubt that racial/ethnic persons who have plenty of choices for houses of worship are going to choose those that say very loudly that they are racist. It is also true that the welcoming effects of having an episcopacy and general agency staff that is disproportionately racial/ethnic is rather limited. This is true for, at a minimum, because relatively few people see any of the 49 bishops or less than 2,000 general agency staff.

  5. Creed Pogue Avatar
    Creed Pogue

    There is a reason we value objective measures over anecdotal evidence. Because with the objective measures we avoid overgeneralization. Of course, there is racism and sexism in the church including in the UMC. They are institutions run by human beings!

    When you just experienced racist behavior by blacks against you simply because you are melanin-challenged, you can’t deny that racism (and sexism), unfortunately, go both ways.

    Objectively, it is true that:
    **there are MORE racial/ethnic (and female) bishops than would be proportional in the clergy
    **there are also MORE racial/ethnic (and female) district superintendents than would be proportional
    **there are MORE racial/ethnic clergy serving in white congregations than white clergy serving in racial/ethnic congregations
    **there are MORE racial/ethnic persons serving on general agency staffs than would be proportional for the clergy or the laity
    Those are objective facts (and have been for quite some time). But, in 1995 we had 7,337,147 reported white members out of a total of 8,496,384 (86.4%) and in 2007 we had 7,049,888 reported white members out of a total of 7,853,955 (89.8%). Of course, if we continue to trumpet our “high” level of racism, we aren’t going to do very well attracting racial/ethnic persons who have a wide variety of alternatives.

    Unfortunately, being a publicly outspoken person, I have been subjected to some of the behaviors you listed even though I am a white male heterosexual Protestant living in the United States. There are a number of truly ignorant, hateful people out there and technology helps them get more notoriety and to be better organized.

    Since you don’t discuss any details, I am not going to question the validity of the accounts. But, I do know that if we continue at our current level of “success,” the Western Jurisdiction by 2055 will be down to less than 185,000 members. The rest of us won’t be much better off.

    1. Jeff Uhler Avatar
      Jeff Uhler

      Creed, I hope you’re not trying to suggest that the racism in our churches is the only thing causing our decline. If so, that’s just not true. There are many factors – all leading back to “sin”. And, Dan’s suggestion holds true for any sin – true repentance of that sin. Part of this would necessarily include accountability to hold up a higher standard – and I’ve watched myself and others who have attempted to do so get run over by the “powers that be” in the local church, the district, and even the conference level. What price are we really willing to pay to become what Christ wants us to become?

    2. doroteos2 Avatar
      doroteos2

      Somehow I am not surprised to see you respond, Creed. We come at this from very different places. I can only ask a couple questions: does the compensatory behavior of placing racial and ethnic minorities into functional positions of power actually imply that we are not racist? If we pay someone well, then slur them with racial epithets, are we to assume we have purchased that right? Is the implication that a person is beaten or abused purely subjective and therefore not to be taken seriously? I hear your lines of defense for the way things are, and I can’t quite accept that you really mean them.

  6. Safiyah Fosua Avatar
    Safiyah Fosua

    Dan,
    Sojourner’s was right years ago when it referred to racism as America’s Original Sin http://www.sojo.net/index.cfm?action=magazine.contents&issue=soj8711

    Some ask why we stay, and seem to be eager to hasten our departure. Others want us to keep the hurt to ourselves so we don’t ruin an otherwise perfect day. Few ask what can be done. Fewer still dare to name the sin that is in our camp.

    Thank you for your insight, your courage and your faith.

  7. Jeff Uhler Avatar
    Jeff Uhler

    Overall, I agree with what you’ve said, Dan. I have experienced racism when a pastor of another race followed me and I had the task of helping the good folks in the church accept the new pastor and see if God was at work through him or her. I’ve also been the recipient of racism when differing cultural understandings caused me to be misunderstood rather than heard. When folks have been the recipients of hatred through racism, the expectation that others who are like those heaping hatred upon them will do the same often overrides the current message being shared.

    I do, however, have a concern. You stated: “When people join The United Methodist Church, they make a promise before God and the company of believers to reject evil. We still need to be in ministry to all of God’s people, including racists, but we do not have to allow those who practice hate, violence, and destruction to infect the body.”

    So, how do we hold folks accountable to this standard? And, are our bishops and district superintendents ready for all the flack that will come their way as a result?

    I think I know the answers, but would like to hear your thoughts.

    1. Creed Pogue Avatar
      Creed Pogue

      When the General Commission on Religion and Race feels called to involve themselves in a discussion over the wisdom of moving a church a few blocks to a better building and suggests that racism played a role when the church is racial/ethnic, the new neighborhood is racial/ethnic and the presiding bishop is racial/ethnic, I am amazed that they aren’t trumpeting all of these other types of occurances.

      When a staffer from GCRR who is monitoring our NEJ Conference can say that the reason why there weren’t “enough” racial/ethnic persons appointed to general boards and agencies is because of the composition of our College of Bishops, I really wonder. We appointed more racial/ethnic persons than are proportionally in the laity, the clergy AND the general population of the Northeast. The College of Bishops consists of four racial/ethnic and five white persons, yet the elders in full connection are over 90% white.

      Those are objective measures.

      If there are real problems, there is more than enough structure to handle them.

      1. doroteos2 Avatar
        doroteos2

        You call us to use objective criteria, then rely on anecdotal evidence of a few dysfunctional incidence and agencies. There is no objectivity in that. And I am sorry, as long as you want to base justice on quotas, we’re talking two very different languages.

    2. doroteos2 Avatar
      doroteos2

      I am definitely not saying it is easy, and I don’t really think the whole system will support any kind of vetting process for those already “in the system.” I do think it is time for our denomination to go through our Book of Discipline with a fine tooth comb and make sure we have some clarity about what our key statements mean. Our Theological Task, Constitution, Articles of Faith, Social Principles, Mission, membership vows, etc., all look good on paper and sound good to the ear, but there is broad inconsistency about how we apply them. When I worked for the General Board of Discipleship I was connected to a global church and saw race relations — both healthy and ill — around the globe. What I usually saw was some level of dysfunction, not broad health. Whenever I had opportunity to engage in conversations about what could be done — in the United States — to strengthen our stand against racism and fundamental human rights violations, I always met with a mixed response. I guess what I am hoping is that we could at least name the most egregious and unacceptable behaviors and agree that they are unacceptable in Christian community. Who decides? I would be good with General Conference taking it on. I cannot imagine physical violence, threats against individuals and their families, commonly acknowledged hate crimes, and psychological trauma would find defenders in our denomination — at least not in numbers to turn the tide. So, I would love to see us begin with the low hanging fruit, as it were, and show the world that our vision of life in Christ is more grace-filled and loving than it commonly is. And you are right, unless all levels of the system support the movement, it is doomed to fail before it begins. We need leadership to say “enough,” and the communion of United Methodist Christians to endorse it.

Leave a reply to Anne Scott Cancel reply