A.D.D.-U.M.C.

Church, church, you are distracted by many things…

 In response to a pastor’s call to pray for the people of Haiti (and the current cholera crisis), I heard a lay person whisper, “I thought we took care of that!”  I think she was referring to the earthquake response earlier in the year, but we hardly “took care” of anything.  Conditions in Haiti have been horrible non-stop since the quake, even though the UMC and other denominations and relief agencies have moved on to other concerns.  We suffer a subtle but significant attention deficit disorder — trying to attend to so many things that we pay attention to virtually none for more than a fleeting instant.  We want to focus on leadership AND new churches AND reaching new audiences AND revitalizing existing churches AND be in ministry with the poor AND global health AND church growth AND rethinking church AND A Call to Action AND elimination of root causes of poverty AND Nothing But Nets AND Change the World AND AIDS AND disaster response AND apportionments AND guaranteed appointments AND the elimination of institutional racism AND General Conference AND a hundred meetings/workshops/seminars/task forces/tables AND… Jesus wept.

There is no clear priority order for any of these things.  If the UMC could do one — and only one — of the things listed above, we would find ourselves mired in an endless debate over what it should be.  And most people would be fine focusing on one, but within moments would shift focus to something else.  All this because we are not really sure why we are here.  We are pulled in so many directions, and because we aren’t sure where we ought to go, we are “tossed to and fro by every wind of doctrine,” debate, and division.  Everything is important, so nothing is more important than anything else.  Everything is a priority so that nothing is a priority.  We dabble in a little of everything so that we don’t have to excel at anything.  There is nothing to be held accountable to because we never bother identifying concrete missional objectives to measure.  We just count instead — the number of members, the number of churches, the number of dollars — which tell us very little about how well we are “making disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world.”  We are regularly accused of mediocrity because that is all people see.  It is virtually impossible to comprehend all the good things The United Methodist Church is doing because we are doing a little of so very much!

What do we believe God wants us to transform the world into?  Some say “the kingdom of God,” while others cry that “kingdom” is exclusive and patriarchal.  Some say “paradise,” but paradise for whom?  We can’t figure out who we want to allow into our local churches.  What makes us think we will do a better job welcoming the broken and bent into paradise?  Some want only “good” Christians “in” and everyone else “out,” but who gets to decide?  Almost everyone wants to make some artificial division between “us” and “them” based on a spurious and selective scriptural standard.  Many Christians want to reestablish an Old Testament hegemony to displace the New Testament vision of grace and love.  Some wish to attend solely to the leading of the Holy Spirit — as long as everyone agrees with OUR understanding of Spirit.  I think this is part of the problem: everyone wants the world to be “better” but there is no clear definition of what “better” might be.

Yet, we know that love is better than hate.  We know that forgiveness is better than holding grudges.  We know that mercy is better than vengeance.  We know that kindness is better than cruelty.  We know that peace is better than violence.  We know this and dozens of other equally valid things, but it doesn’t seem to make a big difference.  And it may be because we are trying to do too many things at once.  We leave ourselves no time to focus on one important thing — we try to do it all.

What if our denomination dedicated a quadrennium to just one thing?  How about Joy?  We could establish a missional priority for every member, congregation, conference, jurisdiction, board, agency, etc., to produce and share the spiritual fruit of joy throughout the world.  We could mandate the church to celebrate.  We could declare a moratorium on any activity that is not aimed at producing the fruit of joy in the world.  We could have contests to produce the greatest spirit of joy.  Or we could focus on love, or kindness, or generosity, or peace-making.  Just think how powerful a witness we could make were we to get on the same page.

Must we limit ourselves to just one thing?  Couldn’t we do a few things?  Sure, but before long we are right back where we started.  Actually, we could assign different fruits to different jurisdictions: Southeast could be assigned love, Northeast peace, North Central joy, South Central kindness, Western gentleness, and Central conferences generosity.  The General Conference could be a time of making fruit salad — enriching and benefiting everyone together.

There is no simple, one-right-answer.  But it is worth exploring simplifying and focusing, setting a few priorities that drive everything we do to help us more clearly communicate who we are and why we’re here.  Ultimately, it is about paying attention, staying focused, and actually making a difference.  I think we could do it… whatever it is, I can’t remember what I was saying…

9 replies

  1. Dan
    I was going to answer your post but I got sidetracked by Facebook and the Lions game and… and… and… Oh wait now I forgot what I was going to say.

    “Sometime later”

    Multi-tasking is hard. Isn’t doesn’t take much to image our church in a circus as a juggler. The balls are crashing down and scattering. And, I think the biggest of the balls have hit our leaders in the head and the results are not pretty. They are running around trying to pick up the lose balls of what we used to be, trying to toss them in the air again. The results are, sadly, the same.
    I would like to see a single focus strictly enforced. Not sure what would happen but it would be worth a try.

  2. I did a nice exercise with my youth group today. I drew a line on the sidewalk and asked them to walk the line…which they did readily. Then I asked them to walk it again….but this time to say all the things that we are supposed to do to get to the kingdom of heaven on each step. More difficult….but each completed the walk. Then I asked them to do all of this with there eyes up pointed to heaven and focusing on God. None passed my test. Then I went and got the adult class and asked that they stand on either side of my chalk line, and had the kids walk again…this time with there arms out touching each of the adults…..I told them to simply walk eyes on God and to be mindful of prayer, evangelism etc. And all walked the line.

    My point is this. The path gets complex….almost too much to stay on target, but if we allow and rely on a community…if the effort is made to touch each person along the way, then everything simply falls into place. Naive? Probably…I am just a Sunday school teacher….without a lot of national level think tank credits behind my name. My Christian resume reads ” he cares enough to show up on Sunday morning.” But I am reminded of Romans 13:10 You can’t go wrong when you love others. When you add up everything in the law code, the sum total is love.

  3. Fruit salad! I love it. I should say that I hear your concerns–adequately expressed by Rev. Stewart who called Methodism the University of Phoenix of religions. But I wonder if we should start at the level of the conference and the local church: have each church do one thing well. Then we’re a network of vibrant churches who are not spread too thin, and a denomination full of all kinds of wonderful places and people.

    • you mean actually use the “connection” for a good reason? I really like your idea. We could connect all the churches that are feeding people. Connect all the churches that are doing servant evangelism, etc.

  4. I appreciate this post! As a denomination we are all over the place. Last year at Annual Conference, in reaction to the “Imagine No Malaria” campaign, my satirical mind shot out “Imagine Black People in Your Church” – a goal much closer to home and in too many cases, as far from realization.

    The issue is, I think, that we live within a system where such goals, focuses (or focii?), etc., are >b>assigned. What might it look like if we learned to trust individuals, churches, districts, conferences, etc., to choose from among the menu of goals: couldn’t some within a congregation lead the way on joy while others rally for fighting malaria?

  5. Love the metaphor and the vision.

    We can’t resist as an organization the temptation to add layers. I heard our bishop talk about the way the UMC had been simplified. One mission, two great commandments, three simple rules, four ares of focus, five practices of fruit congregations, …

    The list may have stopped at five, but when that list is held up as a model of simplicity, we have some tendencies that are going to be hard to overcome.

  6. Do you suggest a united United Methodist Church? One where we are all facing the same direction, looking at something positive we can do with one another rather than to one another? What a marvelous idea. Doing more by doing less. Where is your church? I would love to have you as my pastor. My kids might even come back to church if they thought it could make a real difference in the world.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s