Often we believe that if we do more of what does not work, it will finally work.  This is the dilemma of the consumer economy.  It leads us to the place where, when we reach a limit and still are unsatisfied, we think, if we only had more, we would be successful or satisfied.  More police, more physicians, more services, more teachers, more stuff.  This is not a solution.  It is an addiction.

This is a quote from Peter Block and John McKnight’s, The Abundant Community, and it is an incisive analysis of the current state of much thinking in The United Methodist Church.  I was talking with a pastor the other day who was beaming in response to an upward trend in his congregation’s worship attendance.

“We’re up over 20% from last year — first growth in over seven years!  We even have some of the people coming to other programs, and our giving is up!  It’s nice to be pastoring a healthy church for a change!”

“How is it healthier?” I asked.

“What do you mean?” he replied.

“Well, you described how your church is bigger, but then you said it was healthy, too.” I explained.

“But, that is healthier.  More is better.” he responded.

“I’m not sure I follow your logic,” I said.  “More is more and better is better and they aren’t automatically the same.  I’m overweight — in this case more isn’t better or healthier.”

“Oh, it’s not the same thing.  Having more people and more money in church are both good things.  They measure health.” he patiently explained.

“If size, activity and budget are the reasons for the church to exist, you are correct.  However, if maturing in discipleship, service to others, and proclamation to the world (the old, preach, teach, and heal model) then you would want different metrics.” I countered.

“Well, I still maintain that going from 90 to 110 on average each week is a good thing.”

“How did you do it?” I asked.

“We started a second service with praise music and videos, real upbeat and energetic.  We don’t do it in the sanctuary, it’s very informal — people bring coffee and kids sit on the floor and color.  People enjoy it because it doesn’t feel like church.” he explained.

The conversation set my mind to working on a thought exercise: what if we removed numeric growth from our equation?  What if we declared a one-year moratorium on “more” and simply asked, “If our church was defined by the present number of people involved, how would it impact our planning?”  Here are some of the thoughts that came to mind:

  • in the absence of planning how to get more people to come to us, we would need to plan how to go out to serve others — with no ulterior motive of getting them to come serve us
  • improvement and development of the existing individuals and community of faith would displace efforts to attract newcomers (which might ultimately prove attractive to outsiders…)
  • allocation of resources would shift — people would invest in what is rather than what might be
  • with quantity off the table, all that’s left to focus on is quality
  • evangelism would return to making disciples instead of inviting people to church
  • stewardship would focus on what we have instead of compensating for what we lack
  • education and spiritual formation would meet people at their various levels of maturing instead of always being designed for visitors and newcomers
  • worship could be about God again instead of being reduced to a tool for evangelism and church growth
  • faith sharing would mean more than an “each one bring one” membership drive
  • our self-esteem would rise once the burden of “not growing” was lifted from our shoulders
  • denominational leaders, websites, publications, and conferences would have to find something else to talk about — like, maybe, the spiritual revival and renewal of church for the transformation of the world (cool)

Ah, but institutional preservation is too important to us.  Survival trumps service every time.  If we don’t get more, and get it soon, we may not be around much longer to engage in these silly thought exercises.  So, instead, let’s declare a moratorium on thinking and get back to “growing the church.”  If we can just a get a few more people in worship each week, I’m sure everything will be just fine.

29 responses to “More-a-torium”

  1. Nora Ortiz Fredrick Avatar

    Excellent points! I tend not to be an either-or but rather a both-and proponent. I still think the accountability and metrics are important but we must be more thoughtful about what we measure. Your list of ideas are great – but I hope we would still be encourage to review, evaluate and reflect on how we are most effective in being the church. Otherwise, we continue to be on the path of “making church folks for the preservation of the UMC.”

  2. Farmer's Daughter Avatar
    Farmer’s Daughter

    OK – changed my handle so if my Pastor sees this he won’t know (he’ll still probably guess!)

    You are, as usual, spot on. Several bullets really hit me.

    “evangelism would return to making disciples instead of inviting people to church” – Now THAT is an evangelism that I would love to be involved in! The idea of doing door hangers, phone calls, etc. totally turns me off.

    “worship could be about God again instead of being reduced to a tool for evangelism and church growth” Like the rabblerouser above, I find that “contemporary worship” is less about God and more about appealing to people. Worship is supposed to be about God. Contemporary worship should only mean we use more contemporary music and liturgy – not an absence of liturgy! (OK – pastor knows who this is already!)

    “faith sharing would mean more than an “each one bring one” membership drive” – again – something I could really get behind!

    I keep repeating – do the right things and people will flock into your doors and you’ll have more money than you know what to do with. Priorities! What comes first?

    1. Todd Anderson Avatar

      Changing HANDLE so PASTOR won’t know ??
      Do you really think most Pastors read or ascribe to any of these ideas? Why would they? The “System” or “Institution” makes them untouchable……..not unlike the Roman Priests who abused all those children who were used like “musical priests” in quietly being assigned to different Parishs. Remember — ours is the ONLY Protestant Denomination that doesn’t CALL our Pastors, but instead, relies on the Bishop’s huge batleship-game like board s/he and the Cabinet use to moves the markers around on every January ……. to do “guaranteed (re-)appointments”. Change this system and you’ll see the effectiveness and productivity (read QUALITY) improve by leaps and bounds.

      1. Dan R. Dick Avatar
        Dan R. Dick

        I understand the energy behind your view on this, however, having worked ecumenically for a long, long time, there is no guarantee that a call system will be any kind of improvement over an appointment system. This is honestly a case where the grass looks greener on the other side of the fence, but were you standing over there the reverse would be true…

  3. David Kueker Avatar

    Excellent point. More often leads to the “quick fix” rather than to solid growth.

  4. Becky Coleman Avatar
    Becky Coleman

    Dan, as always you make good points. At the same time, I personally belong to a church with many people in the last quarter of their lives. It seems to me to be good stewardship to be mindful of that fact in what we do and are. As our churches develop disciples, that should radiate outward from those individuals, to the point that others ask, “what’s going on?” and the answer is “Come and see.” Under learning to share our faith, it seems to me that “Come and see” would be in the “tool kit.”
    I’m with you 100 percent about reporting numbers; they only tell part of the story. Some years ago, about 15-25 percent of our Sunday attendance was children and youth under 21. Good for discipleship, good for the kids, but maybe not so good in terms of financial support for ministry. I understand stewardship in a very broad way, and I agree with your point (made at another time) that God provides our congregations with what is needed to do ministry, if we only open our eyes, minds & hearts. Shalom.

  5. Todd Anderson Avatar

    forgot to request f/up comments via email

  6. maestro137 Avatar

    Well of course I agree….but rabblerousers, free thinkers, BOMMERS per-se, are seldom paid attention to — unless, as you know personally, Dan, you step on some of those “Instutitional Toes”.

    What smacked me in the face about this was the comments about the “Contemporary” Service not “feeling like church”. It doesn’t — because it ISN’T !!!

    I haven’t commented much but know that I do read your blogs as they are posted. I am a card-carrying member of the Dan DIck Fan CLub.

    1. Rex Nelson Avatar
      Rex Nelson

      When does a rock concert become worship and vice versa? Billy Graham Evangelistic Association put on Rock the Lake Milwaukee. Which was that? By liturgy, do you mean “a standardized order of events” or “work of the people”? Are church and worship the same thing? For that matter, can a rock concert never be church?

      Oh, and I think rock music might only be contemporary if you’re living in the latter half of the last century.

      1. Todd Anderson Avatar

        Rex what I mean by liturgy is “work of the people”. With all due respect, I do believe that’s the definition of the word.

        A “Rock The Lake Milwaukee” event, IMHO, wouldn’t be Worship. It would be, as I am afraid many events coined “Contemporary Worship” are, more of a Music than a Worship “event”.

        Church and Worship, for many, are the same. For me — not so much — as Worship is where and when we offer our Thanks and Praise, in a corporate setting, with a “roadmap” known as an Order of Service/Basic Pattern, etc., on a REGULAR basis. “church” (lower case) is better described as the gathered as well as dispersed COMMUNITY of professing, practicing Christians on that path to perfection Fr. John urges us all to walk.

      2. Zuhleika Avatar
        Zuhleika

        Sadly – much of contemporary worship and Christian music festivals are not so much about God and are more about ourselves. There is nothing wrong with music festivals, be they contemporary music, Gregorian chants, Bach music, Charles Wesley hymns, etc. But they are music festivals and NOT worship. We may gather together as the church for purposes other than worship. It is nice to include some worship elements (prayer and praise) but it isn’t a substitute for a true worship service. I like Taize services – but they are not a substitute for a regular worship service. While liturgy means work of the people, I do know that some people actually connect better with God in a quiet and solitary setting rather than surrounded by people – I am that person sometimes. But I know that my quiet time alone with God is NOT a substitute for public worship.

        I should probably not post this – we’ve gotten off track from the original blog – Sorry, Dan.

  7. Jim Searls Avatar
    Jim Searls

    I remember reading that Edward Evertt said to Abraham Lincoln, after they both had delivered Gettysburg Address (Evert spoke for more than two hours, Lincoln for about three minutes) that Lincoln had come far closer to the point.
    I think Dan has come far closer to the point in his eleven bullets than all of the church growth stuff I have read over the last 20 years.
    Thanks Dan

    1. Dan R. Dick Avatar
      Dan R. Dick

      Thank you, Jim. Kind words — we’ll see if others agree with you!

Leave a reply to Vanessa Jackson Cancel reply