Oh, man, time to go fishin’ cause I opened up a can of worms!  For ten straight days my Inbox has been full of emails concerning race relations in The United Methodist Church.  The emails are troubling on two separate levels — one, that people don’t feel safe airing their views publically on the blog (“please don’t post these comments publically…), and two, the stories reflect a serious problem in the way we treat those who are different.  I have received 126 emails — 3 saying that there is no racism in the church today, 21 saying that racism goes both ways and that whites are the current victims of racism, 18 saying it isn’t really racism if it is justified (i.e., if minorities are indeed inferior then we’re not being unfair, just telling the truth…), and a whopping 84 telling heartbreaking and painful stories of racism encountered at all levels of our church systems.  I’ve heard from three bishops, seven district superintendents, one agency general secretary and a whole boatload of pastors who say, unequivocally, racism is alive and all too well in The United Methodist Church.

The problem with such overwhelming response (at least, overwhelming for this small, humble blog…) is that it highlights all the symptoms of the problems, without addressing the root causes.  The bottom-line root cause is simple: we are allowing racism in the church.  And I find it troubling that 2/3 of the stories indicate that racism is a real problem, while 1/3 dismiss it as irrelevant.  We have yet to declare once and for all time that racism is evil and violent and unChristian and unacceptable.  I’m not talking about racism grounded in ignorance or negligence.  I am talking about outright prejudice and bigotry grounded in the hate of people based on heritage or skin color.  I am talking about overt, unapologetic racism.  Now, it may remain hidden and secret for a long, long time, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t there.  If you want to discover whether there is “underground” racism in your midst, accept a cross-cultural appointment.  Regardless of your feelings about cross-cultural appointments, regardless of how “good” or “qualified” the pastor is (both smokescreen issues), if there is racism in the congregation, it will be revealed.

In this case, unChristian is to Christian, as undead is to the living.  We have our emotional and spiritual equivalents in the church to the great monsters of gothic horror fiction — vampires who drain and dissipate positive energy and life, zombies who infect and consume and turn others through their poison, and werewolves who attack and savage and tear apart.  We are talking about creatures who are bent on doing violence, and they don’t care who gets hurt.  These are not merely misunderstood “sinners,” these are the people who are actively doing evil to their brothers and sisters.  Am I overstating?  I don’t know.  This past week I have heard of:

  • death threat phone calls in the middle of the night
  • vandalism of homes and vehicles, with hate messages scrawled in a disgusting variety of substances
  • actual shots fired from weapons at homes
  • children being followed from school or called at home while alone
  • hateful rumors being spread
  • physical assaults
  • name-calling and racial slurs in church
  • destruction of property
  • dead animals left of doorsteps
  • people dressing up in sheets and hoods and running across pastor’s lawns

Now, you may want to defend that these things happen everywhere and they aren’t necessarily racially motivated.  Great.  Sorry, but there is no justification for these types of behaviors in churches, and I believe there is a much higher incidence in race-related situations.  No, this isn’t just about the sin of racism, but about the evil of racism.  This isn’t just “bad” behavior, this is “monstrous” behavior.  Sin is about weakness and wrong-headedness; evil is unrepentant, intentional and self-righteous.  When people repent their racism, there is hope — sin can be forgiven and grace may abound.  But let’s be brutally honest, some folks love their racism and cloak it in a twisted form of Christianity, never acknowledging that the two orientations are mutually exclusive.  One cannot be Christian and racist at the same time.  One precludes the other.  To pretend otherwise is to… well, pretend otherwise.  We will always have to battle bias, prejudice, bigotry and ignorance, but racism is intolerable.  It is a form of evil, and as such we are complicit with it in any system where we do not work to eradicate it.

It is a source of shame that we have named racism (and sexism) as the evil that it truly is (see our Social Principles) yet allow it to continue unchallenged in so many places in our church and society.  It is a virulent infection, a toxic poison, and a debilitating cancer.  It turns people into monsters, and it only takes a few infected hearts to corrupt an otherwise healthy system.  It undermines the integrity of the body, and it accepts disease as normal while rejecting health and vitality.  It becomes part of our witness to the world, thereby destroying our credibility with a hurting, multicultural world.  It proclaims to all the world that we believe intolerance, injustice, exclusivity, and bigotry are simply part of who we are.  Until we take a stand against such behaviors and make racism absolutely unacceptable in The United Methodist Church, our witness is tainted and unChristian.

So, what does this mean?  Do we tell racists they can’t be part of the church?  Yes.  When people join The United Methodist Church, they make a promise before God and the company of believers to reject evil.  We still need to be in ministry to all of God’s people, including racists, but we do not have to allow those who practice hate, violence, and destruction to infect the body.  Racism is a clear violation of our membership vows, our Social Principles, our Theological Task, and our mission and vision.  There is no place for racism in the body of Christ.  But this is just my opinion.  I have been told by many that I am wrong and that you cannot hold people accountable to their vows.  But I question whether people with such hate ever become “members,” no matter what words they say or promises they make.  I cannot quite believe that we would stand by and let one member do physical violence to another, especially repeatedly.  Certainly, we would continue to care for such a person, but there would be some limits.  This isn’t about “kicking people out” of the church, but being clear what “being in” the church is all about.

One email really took me to task for being a “pansy” when it comes to the question of race, and wondered why I “buy into” the lie.  I have in my files a picture that was taken at a church I served.  The picture is dated 1915.  It shows the pastor of the church in his robes standing with two men in three-piece suits near the front of the church building.  They are laughing together and appear to be celebrating.  Behind them, hanging by the neck from a tree branch, hands tied behind his back with barbed-wire, is a young, black man.  Surely we have come a long way since 1915…  A few years ago I showed this picture to a well-educated pastor in Nashville, Tennessee.  I will never forget his response.  “Hmmm,” he said, “I wonder what he did to deserve that?”

This story isn’t any worse than the dozens I have heard this past week.  I know there will be many in our church who think I am just rattling on about something that isn’t very important.  But I have lost sleep this week thinking about the future of our church and the future of our world.  I think about how we pride ourselves on our open hearts and minds and doors, but I wonder just how open we really are?  One of the emails I got this morning chastised me for “focusing on a few isolated instances and making a big deal out of nothing.”  Maybe this is true, but I guess I feel like even a few isolated instances are too many for a church the professes the love of God and the grace of Jesus Christ through the Holy Spirit.

47 responses to “A House Divided”

  1. Anne Scott Avatar
    Anne Scott

    Is Creed Pogue a real person? He sounds too contrived, like he is a made up person to prove all your points. You’re not using a dummy persona to manipulate people’s feelings are you?

    1. doroteos2 Avatar
      doroteos2

      Anne,
      I can only assume Creed is real. At any rate, I didn’t make him up. I am happy he posts here, so that people can see the diverse approaches and beliefs we have in the church. I can hardly imagine someone with whom I hold a more different worldview, but he has as much right to his opinions as I do.

    2. Creed Pogue Avatar
      Creed Pogue

      I assure you that I am as real as you. 🙂

      Are you from California or North Carolina or somewhere in between?

      If you think I am making Dan’s “case” for him, then I wonder how balanced your scales are to begin with.

  2. Creed Pogue Avatar
    Creed Pogue

    Your tweet asks to prove a negative which is virtually impossible. Also, what exactly are you wanting to be proven wrong about?

    If you are saying that there are racists who are members of the UMC and people who are willing to tolerate or excuse racist behavior, then I would and have said that you are correct. There are racists in every human institution and racism goes in all directions.

    If you are saying that racism is simply a “white man’s burden,” then your own experience at SBC21 proves that you are wrong.

    If you are saying that the UMC is inherently a racist institution, then I would say that the facts of the composition of its leadership would prove you very, very wrong.

  3. Robert Gage Avatar
    Robert Gage

    I am following this blog and the one on Mad Methodists and I want to echo Jeff Colclasure’s comment in regard to this post and support what Creed Pogue says. I am a Bible believing Christian and I should not have to apologize for any scriptural belief, including the idea that some people are created better than others. It doesn’t take a genius to see that we are not all created equally. I do not believe women should be preachers — biblical — and I do not believe all races are equal — biblical — and I believe in capital punishment — biblical — and I believe homosexuality is a sin — biblical — and I believe in evil spirits and demon possession — biblical. I am consistent in my beliefs and I am insulted by people who only want to believe the parts of the Bible they like and throw out the rest.

    1. Creed Pogue Avatar
      Creed Pogue

      Sometimes, we are in a position of asking to be saved from our “friends.” I believe that God created everyone of all races deserving of fair treatment and respect. I believe that women are as able and called to preach the Gospel as men are–unfortunately there are good and bad female as well as good and bad male pastors. I do not believe that homosexuality is a sin and I strongly disagreed with our African brother who said that “homosexuality is a tool of the Devil.” However, at least while we have guaranteed appointment, I do not support ordination of homosexual clergy.

  4. Dan Dick on racism in the UMC « John Meunier's blog Avatar

    […] Dick on racism in the UMC March 16, 2010 by John Meunier Dan Dick recounts some details from an avalanche of powerful e-mail messages he has received after raising the issue of racism in […]

  5. John Meunier Avatar

    Dan, thank you for sharing the stories. I never have encountered such stories – a result of my sheltered existence or blindness. Telling stories like these is more powerful than any polemic as far as I’m concerned.

    Remember, a little yeast leavens the whole loaf. Even if these are “isolated incidents” as your e-mail says, they are still yeast enough to make the whole loaf unclean.

    Your strong stand against allowing evil in our midst is certainly in keeping with both UMC doctrine and law and the teaching of Paul. John Wesley preached that anyone who committed a knowing and conscious sin was rejecting his or her baptism.

    The problem I see, is that taking action in the face of this sin is wildly out of step with our actual practice. We barely speak of sin much less take action based on people turning their backs on their baptismal vows. We preach gospel without law to use Wesley’s ways of speaking of it.

    As you often note, the system we have is designed to get the results it gets. The people in the system are those who are good at fitting into the current system. I’m not sure we can take a strong stand against racism isolated from the broader lack of starch in our spines about sin and baptismal faithfulness.

    1. doroteos2 Avatar
      doroteos2

      And I understand the slippery slope — we have a tendency to label everything we don’t like or that had a specific biblical precedent as “unacceptable” as evil, which ultimately gets us nowhere. There are some grey areas — and I guess what is crystal clear to me (i.e., threatening to hurt someone’s child, shooting a gun at a home, writing a hate slogan on a person’s car) is a grey area to some. But the challenge remains, how do we hold each other accountable to the fundamental behaviors that build community, and how do we differentiate between being Christian and being nice. One of the emails I received from an African American woman who decided to leave the ministry, not only because of the treatment she received, but due to the lack of support she got from her conference, was told that it was “her job” to forgive the threats of violence made against her and love the people who made them. When she asked what kind of action could be taken to stop the threats from being made, she was cautioned not to do anything that might make the people decide to leave the church. This mixed up, don’t-alienate-those-engaging-in-violent-behavior, attitude is a problem that we should address. Even if racism is a symptom of mental illness, as some have suggested to me, doesn’t mean we simply look the other way. We need to treat it and not allow it to destroy the fabric of our faith communion. I know that many people feel I am overstating the case, but that is where the free exchange of opinions come in, How much poison is too much poison? Some say, whatever doesn’t kill you makes you stronger; I say, why should we tolerate any level of poison?

      1. Creed Pogue Avatar
        Creed Pogue

        I don’t believe that anybody on this blog or any Christian for that matter believes that threatening children, shooting at someone’s house or cowardly writing their hate on a car is anything but sinful behavior for which there is no excuse. If a bishop or a district superintendent actually told a pastor not to speak up about that behavior, then the problem is with the bishop or the DS. Being prophetic, it would be your obligation to name them.

        Anonymous accusations with no framework don’t solve any problems.

  6. Jeff Uhler Avatar
    Jeff Uhler

    I was re-reading your post, Dan, and another line stood out. You state that “people don’t feel safe airing their views publically…” I’d leave it at “people don’t feel safe.” The churches they’ve experienced have come across as judgmental and lacking in love. Our culture has placed some folks on levels “above” others so when a person is perceived at a “lower” level, they aren’t comfortable either. A person who is a sex-offender may be a case in point. When that label gets applied, it doesn’t matter if it was a teenage boy, albeit above 16, with a younger teen girl having consensual relations or not. They are often viewed as evil, manipulative, and aggressive no matter the level of their transgression. They are treated differently.

    Racism, as a major disease of our culture, has been around long enough to embed deeply in our culture and become a point of identity. Some folks can’t see life outside of the parameters by which their race has been defined – and some like it that way on either side of the issue.

    As followers of Christ, the challenge I see is developing those safe places for people to be themselves – that doesn’t mean accepting bad behavior, but valuing the person regardless of their chosen or received by birth identity.

    Just a thought. Jesus said, “They’ll know you are my disciples by your love.”

    Shalom

  7. Will Avatar

    Creed, I don’t see Dan stating that the UMC is a racist institution. I do, however see him stating that there are too many people within the institution who hold racist attitudes and engage in racist behaviors. Yes, there is a difference.

    1. Creed Pogue Avatar
      Creed Pogue

      If that is all he is saying, then no one could disagree with that. I have already said that I believe that racism is present in the UMC as it is within all human institutions.

      There is a huge difference between that and the sense of pervasive overt racism that Dan gave in his initial posting. I don’t believe that any UM pastor today would be grinning in a photo of someone who was lynched. I really wish Dan would attach names to his anecdotes, for instance, of the Nashville pastor who thought the guy deserved it. Otherwise, you put yourself in the position of unintentionally smearing every UM pastor in Nashville or who ever served in Nashville.

Leave a reply to John Meunier Cancel reply