Ah, the elections are over.  Some people are happy, some are not.  I, for one, am happy — not because the people I voted for got elected (they didn’t), but that we will not be subjected to the petty, spiteful, disrespectful, spurious, un-true/half-true, patronizing, attacking ads anymore.  I cannot remember in recent years so many ads that both attacked the opponent AND insulted my intelligence.  It was as if the candidates and their public relations handlers counted on the ignorance and gullibility of the viewing audience.  “So-and-so has been in office the past two years — therefore he/she is responsible for all that happened.”  Please tell me that no one actually confuses correlative reality with causal fact.  I have often been hired to mediate disputes that got worse after I arrived.  No one was ever silly enough to blame me for the escalated tension.  People elected just two years ago inherited an incredible mess.  There is no way they should shoulder the blame — either for the mess or for not cleaning up in two years what took over ten years to create.

Ah, but this is human nature (fallen human nature, but human nature nonetheless).  How many times in our churches do we encounter a problem decades in the making that we lay at the current pastor’s feet?  How frequently do we allow bad behaviors to go unchecked for years, then act all surprised when problems pop up?  In a culture tolerant of anti-social behavior, we cannot be surprised when it permeates our churches as well.  Of course, we could do something about it… if we wanted to.  But we don’t seem to want to.  We are allowing the church and the whole Christian faith to be reinterpreted for us by popular culture and media pundits.  Case in point: socialism.

With growing amazement I followed the rhetoric about “socialist” government.  Someone, somewhere, sometime noted that egalitarian care for all is a tenet of socialism, so therefore any government involvement in “universal” anything must be socialist.  Someone, somewhere, sometime noted that care for the poor and marginalized is viewed as a moral imperative in socialism, so any focus on “immigration reform” that is framed in terms of justice or compassion must be socialist.  Socialism as a form of government is a complex and convoluted beast, and it defies simple acceptance or rejection; as a philosophy it becomes even more complex — especially for Christians.  Setting aside the politics and disallowing corrupted examples of bad socialist governments for a moment, Christians are faced with a disconcerting truth — regardless of what Glenn Beck might say to the contrary, there is a whole lot more socialism than capitalism in the gospels.  Social justice is central to the teachings of Jesus.  It gets even worse with Paul.

Once political parties usurp concepts and twist them for their own purposes, we get into some messy problems.  The teachings of Jesus really don’t belong to any “ism” and shame on us for allowing them to be mis-appropriated by a secular culture that doesn’t understand or respect them.  There has been virtually nothing “social” about any of the political discourse this season.  A misunderstanding and misapplication of “socialism” to our current situation doesn’t make the statements true.  (Swimming in a duck pond doesn’t automatically make you a duck; caring for the poor and marginalized doesn’t automatically make you a bleeding-heart liberal socialist… believe me; all my conservative friends working in homeless shelters and at soup kitchens HATE the assumption when it is made about them!)

We’re standing in a very dangerous place.  When we allow the secular culture to state that care for the poor, love of the stranger, responsibility for the widow and orphan, visiting the prisons, etc., are part of a negative agenda it spells trouble.  We cannot let being like Jesus and doing the will of God be reframed as a political agenda.  No more can we allow “values” to be ascribed to one political party over another.  Our political passions cannot overrule our common sense and our faith.  It breaks my heart that justice, mercy, kindness, compassion, economic equity, and basic sharing have all been stained by political posturing.

Socialist?  Not socialist?  Republican?  Democrat?  (Green?  Independent?  Sky-blue pink?)  None of this really matters if the only way we can relate is in a decidedly “anti-social” manner.  Unless our faith is great enough to allow us to set aside political differences, the healing work of Christ simply won’t happen.  I think of Paul’s statement in Ephesians that Christ has broken down the dividing walls of hostility, then I think of some very ugly disputes I have witnessed recently in our churches as well as in our political arenas.  Folks, we have to stop following along like sheep and start leading.  Just because the rest of the world gets mired in senseless debate doesn’t mean we have to.  Just because the rest of the world divides itself into self-righteous winners and losers doesn’t mean we have to.  Just because the rest of the world resorts to insult, disrespect, slander, half-truth, innuendo, intimidation, and violence doesn’t mean we have to.  No, we need to model a different way — a better way.  Some might try to label it (something like “socialism) as a way to dismiss it.  But saying something doesn’t automatically make it so.  What we need is to strive to be like Christ, together, and not be overly concerned what labels might be applied.  And maybe if we can begin to offer a better way, others might follow us for a change.

43 responses to “Anti-socialism”

  1. rob in soviet canukistan Avatar
    rob in soviet canukistan

    It fascinates me that talk of out of control Government spending in America almost invariably ignores the $663,255,000,000 elephant in the room. The price of “free” enterprise is the largest and most expensive military force on the planet. What would Jesus have to say about that?

    1. Kathy Makus Avatar
      Kathy Makus

      Probably the same thing he said about the Roman government’s massive military spending.

  2. doroteos2 Avatar
    doroteos2

    It is fascinating that everyone has favorite “causes” to explain the current situation. Going back to the Reagan administration and the Savings and Loan crisis forward, every administration owns a part of the problem, yet blame is placed on the “other” party. Until we own up to the fact that we have ONE government culpable for almost four decades of poor decisions and inadequate responses, I wonder if there is any possibility of true and lasting recovery?

  3. Wesley White Avatar

    We’ve just been through a negative-ad race, similar to the nuclear-arms race that brought us more bombs than we can use. Both races have echoes that last years beyond their moment in time. Both races have their parallels.

    Negative ad – Matthew 5.22 – But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire. – Kevin has a “cause” of weak federal government that could excuse him from this passage – there are other “causes” folks use to justify their anger and language – I’m partial to incomplete or false etymologies.

    Nuclear arms – 1 Corinthians 11-13 – But now I am writing to you not to associate with anyone who bears the name of brother or sister who is sexually immoral or greedy, or is an idolater, reviler, drunkard, or robber. Do not even eat with such a one. For what have I to do with judging those outside? Is it not those who are inside that you are to judge? God will judge those outside. “Drive out the wicked person from among you.” – This is schism to keep us pure, to divide Christ’s body that lived for all – it gets used in homogenous churches and those with a particular vision of the country as Christian or whatever. We are justified in raising the stakes with fiery crosses, civil war, division over slavery or free pews or gay and lesbian Christians or . . . .

    Thank you continuing to work toward a better way of relating with one another, both within and without our communion – like it or not we have a foot in both worlds. I don’t think we can currently elect or structure our way out of our current political choices. Finding common cause with one another, able to incorporate our various partial wisdoms, is difficult, but not impossible work.

  4. David Harstin Avatar
    David Harstin

    Dittos Kevin! Not to mention the Community Reinvestment Act of the late 1970s and its expansion in the 1990s that gave us the bad credit/housing crisis. Also, the current depression was greatly expanded with passage of the 2007 Omnibus Spending Bill spearheaded by the current house and senate which included our current President that reversed the declining budget deficits of the previous three years. Then came 2008 and America’s plunge into full blown depression with all the bailouts and handouts. It was definitely stimulus spending–stimulus spending that further paved the road to socialism and national decline.

  5. Lyn Avatar
    Lyn

    Great article! Comment #1: missing the point entirely.

  6. Kevin Avatar
    Kevin

    President Obama did indeed inherit a mess and then made it worse by adding trillions in debt on top of the mess. We have a federal system of government that ideally should have strong state governments and not a overly strong national government. It is clear that the American people thought the national government over reached. Socialism? I look to the %GDP that is federal spending. Cuba 81%, France 61%, Sweden 58% USA is now over 40% and climbing. That is the march toward socialism. We are allowing the secular culture to define good works as the government spreading your hard earned money.

  7. Kevin G. Lindsay Avatar
    Kevin G. Lindsay

    Way to take the high road, and remind us which political kingdom we should be following. I grew up in the late 70’s and was so relieved when the communist curtain finally fell. I remember watching the German’s up on the wall and finally the burden of a regime which sought absolute control over it’s people was lifted. So if that type of government is trying to be foisted on me, then I think it is in my best interest as a citizen to stand up and prevent that. Might I recommend that we all reread Dietrich Bonhoffer and CS Lewis as their perspective while living the nightmare of WW II still provides insights into today’s political situation.
    God Bless and keep up the good thought provoking writing.
    Kevin

Leave a reply to rob in soviet canukistan Cancel reply